The Illusion of Space and Motion between Objects

                     Where there is a constant velocity of the interflow of space-time between objects, neither flow decelerating nor accelerating, whatever those equal velocities may be, the objects will appear as stationary. Since space time is flowing into itself, a specific differential of velocity between those reciprocal flows, but neither accelerating nor decelerating, will appear as specific distance between stationary objects. If there is a differential of acceleration/deceleration between the reciprocal flows of space-time, objects will appear to our senses to be in motion. The ratio of the differential of interflow of space-time will determine our perception of the velocity of objects in motion. This is the process by which Consciousness perceives through Life Forms the illusion of objects in “motion”, objects at a distance and objects at rest.

                     The Life Form also as an “object” does not exist on its own. It is a translative configuration of the surrounding warp of the interflow of Space-Time. When the curvature of surrounding Space-Time is altered, a deceleration and acceleration of its directionless flow of translation creates the illusion within our grey matter of increasing or decreasing “space” between “objects”. Thus varying rates of the acceleration and deceleration of the interflow of space-time are perceived as varying measures of Velocity, Mass and Distance.

                     The deceleration of Space-Time caused by all objects in existence is what we interpret as “gravitational force” or the growing attraction between objects of Mass the “closer” they get to each other. The acceleration of Space-Time caused by all objects in existence is what we interpret as accelerating “Universal expansion”, or the accelerating expansion of Space-Time between objects the further away they are from each other. As Space-Time is always in constant directionless translative flow due to the continual interpenetration of Universal Spans, the presence of objects within the “flow” modifies this fundamental constancy. 

                     As Universal Spans are continually interpenetrating within the Multiverse, there is a basic foundation of simultaneous forces throughout the Multiverse of directionless expansion, or depending upon our interpretation, directionless compression. The compression is really an expansion of the Multiverse into itself. This fundamental ex-pression of the Multiverse creates our perceptions of Universal expansion and of the overall gravitational force of the Cosmos. 

                     Wherever we are, we interpret the Universe as expanding because Space-Time is interpenetrating through us and around us. The translative forces flowing through and around us maintain our perceptions of ourselves as existing in the present, as they give a sense of “fixed position”, which also enables our perceptions of our individuality. The accelerative flow of translation through and around us, interacting with the decelerative flow, maintain our shape and form, as well as enabling our perception of an expanding Universe, together with our interpretations of “present, past and future”, and “objects at a distance”. All of these “forces” are translations and perspectives of Primary Consciousness flowing into itself, of which we are an undivided part. Because Primary Consciousness is the foundation of Existence – (Inertia as the mind that is translating itself), and because we interpret this translation as “Space-Time”, “Space and Time” emerging from this condition are actually manifest illusions of this deeper reality from which we extend. Because we are a part of it, because we ourselves are Inertia, we see its translations as our reality ..filtered through our neurological perception as “Space, Time, Energy and Matter” and especially as “Motion”. Later into this writing we will explore how one can alter the interflow of space-time, which is a function of consciousness, through meditation.
 

                     Space-Time is not a quantity, but is an intensity of Celerity, a reciprocal translative flow of Inertial Thought, of Trans-Emanation, (interflow) - the reciprocal Versing of Inertia through itself, that we perceive geometrically. There is no “distance” between objects, as all of Space-Time lies between every two objects in existence, no matter how far apart or how close together we perceive objects to be. 

                     Its directionless flow, its intra-translation of itself is the phenomenon that we perceive as “polarity” in all things beheld. Space, Time, Distance, Quantity, Matter, Energy and Velocity are all neurological interpretations of the varied intensities of the modified Celerity of Primary Consciousness ..of the foundational Fluxion of Existence flowing into itself.

                     The interflow of Space-Time simultaneously moving toward, through and away from every object within our Universe interacts with the aggregate of the attractive and repulsive forces of those objects. All objects in existence therefore intensify the attractive force within Space-Time that we perceive as the accelerating “pull of Gravity” between objects – as well as intensifying the repulsive force within Space-Time that we perceive as the accelerating “expansion of our Universe”. Through their undivided interaction with surrounding Space-Time, each object appears to be moving faster away the further it is from any other object/observer – because of the simultaneous acceleration/deceleration of Space-Time between, through and around objects. 

                    When two or more objects are in close proximity however, their combined effect upon surrounding Space-Time is inversely proportional to the attractive/repulsive forces of their combined Mass. In other words, in order for the inverse relationship that creates accelerating “gravitational attraction”, (the deceleration of Space-Time between objects), to exist, the combined Mass of the objects must be greater than the modified translation of the Space-Time that lies between them. This is what actually defines "locality" among objects.

                    The inverse relationship is always the same for all objects existing within a Space-Time “Warp Field”, (within that localized vicinity), because each object, although its Mass may be different from others, creates the inverse equation in the same way. The total Mass of two or more objects has a cumulative effect upon surrounding Space-Time when the intensity of Space-Time between the objects is less than the combined intensity of Space-Time that the objects consist of. The surrounding field then becomes warped proportionally by each object within it. Since the field is undivided from itself and from the objects that exist within, the accumulated forces of the field becomes its total potentiality affecting all objects within that domain in the same way. Thus objects of differing Mass always “fall” at the same accelerative rate of “speed” because a common deceleration of Space-Time between objects in the same Warp Field is created by the cumulative Mass of the objects involved. 

                     When an object falls toward the Earth, the Earth reciprocally “falls” toward the object. It's always a question of perspective because its always relative. "Motion" between objects is always a duality of the accelerative and decelerative velocities of the interflow of space-time between them. If objects are simultaneously falling toward the Earth from different directions however, then isn't the Earth also “falling” in different directions simultaneously towards each object? As this question seems a nonsensical paradox, it only seems so because it is based upon the physics of non-sense-ability. None of the “objects” are actually “falling” or even moving ..only the Space-Time between the Earth and each object is decelerating/ “contracting” – such “deceleration” a translation of the Consciousness of the objects mediated by the Consciousness of the Space-Time between them ..giving each object involved the appearance to our senses ..of accelerating towards the Earth. 

                     That which we perceive as the “distance” between objects is our neurological translation of the differential intensity of modified Space-Time that is created between them. Intensity is a translation of the differential between the accelerative and decelerative translative flows of inertia. Varying differentials, hence varying intensities of the flow are the result of the curvature of the flow being modified/interfered with by “eddies” in the flows resulting from the existence of objects within the Wholeness from which they are undivided. 

                     If the intensity of Space-Time between the objects is less than the intensity of Space-Time that constitutes the combined Mass of the objects, a Warped Field of Space-Time, of relational intensity is created between and around the objects. Because Space-Time is warped between the objects, Space-Time decelerates between them, making them appear to draw closer – and space-time accelerates away around them. As they get, (to our perception), “closer”, the directionless translative flow of Space-Time is further affected, inversely affected by the attractive and repulsive forces of the objects. The repulsive forces in effect expand Space-Time away while the attractive forces contract Space-Time between the objects. Both effects increase in intensity – and to our perception, “increase in speed”, the further into the warp the objects go. This happens because the warp is made more intense by the increase of deceleration of Space-Time between the objects the “closer” they get to each other.

                     Simply put, each object in existence is maintained in existence by the continuing interpenetration of surrounding ambient Space-Time that the objects are undivided from. Since they are part of surrounding Space-Time, when two or more objects warp Space-Time, they are warping that from which they extend. The deceleration of Space-Time between them, together with the acceleration of Space-Time around them is translated into the attractive/repulsive forces that the objects consist of, proportionally altering the Mass of the objects, which further intensifies the surrounding warp.

                     As objects increase in velocity, they proportionally increase in Mass. Velocity therefore is a translation of the curvature of Space-Time into the Mass of an object ..the translation of “Energy” into “Matter” through the translation of Inertia. 

                    With regard to the “expansion of the Cosmos”, objects accelerating away from other objects also gain Mass as they increase relative speed, but the intensity of Space-Time between them is always greater than the combined Mass of the objects, always increasing between the objects. As objects accelerate away from each other faster and further however, their relative Mass increases to the point of where their gravitational force finally matches their accelerative force and their “speed” is thus limited. This limitation is what we interpret as the speed of light, and the edge of the “Universe”, as judged from the center of a Universal Span. Since “Space-Time” is inter-translative, (trans-emanating), all functions occurring within Space-Time are dualistic, reciprocal, simultaneous. Because the reciprocity of Space-time is interpenetrative, occurrences within Space-Time must express differentially, hence accelerative and decelerative translations though mutually codependent may widely vary within the same Unified Field. We interpret these variations as individualized objects of mass, waveforms of energy and velocities of contractions and expansions of Space-Time.

                     The aggregate effect of this interchangeability is to warp the Space-Time around objects, therefore decelerating the directionless flow of Space-Time between them, (which allows them to draw closer – and close upon one another ever faster the closer they get to each other because the differential between the decelerative and accelerative aspects of surrounding Space-Time is inversely proportional to the increasing combined Mass of the objects), and to accelerate its directionless flow that is around them - away from them. ..And through our classical perception, the two objects appear to attract each other, while other objects not in close proximity appear to gain distance. 

                     As this process is one of inverse interaction, at close proximity “attractive forces” – the deceleration of Space-Time - comes into play to intensify the “between” amid objects. If they are further apart, the attractive forces are overcome by the “repulsive forces” – the acceleration of Space-Time - causing objects to move away faster, the further apart they are, as a cumulative effect based upon the inverse ratio. 

                     Because the directionless translative flow of Space-Time is curved, the objects moving away the fastest from any observer are at the outer curvature of the circumference/sphere of a Universal Span. That outer curvature represents the extreme limits of the Multiverse within which “Universal Spans” interpenetrate. As the Multiverse is therefore the “limiter” of the “size” of Universal Spans, the “speed” at which objects appear to accelerate away from other objects is limited at this “distance”. Because objects accelerate away from each other through differential Space-Time, the “speed of light” to our perception, is the limiting speed of the propagation of the Multiverse through itself. Its accelerative force is countered by its decelerative force thus limiting its maximum “speed” of propagation/interpenetration.

                      If we conceive an infinity of Universal Spans, though undivided, but interpenetrated within a Totality, creating an infinity of interpolar perspectives ..an infinity of thoughts of itself, we then comprehend a world of spontaneity driven by “non-local” sources within which free will plays the greatest part. (Even a minimum number of Universal Spans interpenetrating would create the threshold condition within which free will is predominant.) Within this world new ideas are constantly generated to work in concordance with each other and with the greater Totality. Thus Existence ever-becomes - “spontaneously”, through the diversified continuity of the thoughts of the Multiverse. In the final analysis, this Totality is local to itself, but its internal convolutions are non-local to each other, though they spontaneously support each other through its Unified Field – therefore a sameness – a simultaneity of thought oversees all diverging/converging functions/ex-pressions of the Multiverse. This is the Cosmological Constant – the OverSoul - that maintains the Multiverse in continuity through all diversifications of itself. We interpret the varied expressions of this Constant as the “Speed of Light Constant” and as the “Gravitational Constant/Complex” ..but within and of the Totality of the Multiverse, it is actually the common Transcendent Tension of Wholeness of its internally convoluted Circumference/Sphericity – its continuity of thought, of Inertia transcendently acting upon itself that maintains the Multiverse as a whole system and that also drives it into self-diversification.

That self-diversification is what we interpret as Matter and Energy,
Gravity and Velocity and also as Will and Thought…

                    That which we interpret through our senses and brain as “motion” is the dual perception between our “selves”, (as “localizations” of Consciousness perceiving through an “Animate Interface”), and the greater extensity of our Common Consciousness, which is the “environment”, that we imagine that we are moving through. Our perception of “motion” therefore, is our interpretation of the propagation of Consciousness, of thought, through itself, emulating accelerative forces undividedly interacting with decelerative forces.

Example:

                     A wave moving through the ocean propagates through its own extensity, (that extensity being the ocean from which the wave is undivided). The water is the same everywhere, but the wave is a convolution of that which it is moving through. Thus, the wave cannot “move” except through continual communication with the ocean from which it extends. As the wave propagates in one direction, the ocean reciprocally propagates oppositely in relation to and through the wave. (This is what happens when we perceive matter moving through space. Space reciprocally “moves” through matter. Actually, neither are moving, but are continually exchanging polarities of unified thought – thus through such “communication” – matter becomes space and space becomes matter – simultaneously in continuity.

                     As electrons propagate through a wire, the spaces between the electrons are said to propagate oppositely, but within the substructure of this process there is only a continual, reciprocal exchange of polarities – a transfer of Inertial Thought - that through our illusion mimics physical motion.

                    The polarities of the ocean wave communicate with the polarities of the greater extensity of the ocean and exchange information and thus the changing polarization of the entire process propagates through the continuity of the ocean and reciprocally through the wave. Now, it may be said that the process of wave propagation is driven by the wind over the ocean or by the motion of the earth or by the gravitational pull of the moon, but each of these forces are only further polarization’s – in decelerative and accelerative flux – driven by the transcendent tension of an undivided Wholeness upon itself to form diversifications within and of itself.

                    There is no actual physical motion except through our limited and unique perception, of the concurrent processing of polar communications through the differential geometry of the Multiverse. 

Of what does the Multiverse consist?

                     We can label it in so many ways, a Wholeness of Inertia, a Wholeness of Primary Consciousness, the Wholeness of Existence, a Wholeness of “Nothingness”. The key word that we see in all of these descriptions however, is Wholeness.

The Intrinsic Dynamism that is Transcendence

                     There is something unique about a Wholeness that we are generally not aware of. It has a property that appears paradoxical. It cannot ever be fully measured because it is always greater than the sum of its undivided parts. When we imagine a Wholeness, we imagine completeness, perfection. There are only two numbers that achieve this theoretical condition, One - the totality of Existence …and Zero – the absence of Existence, a totality of “Nothingness”.

                     When we consider “Nothingness” to be equal to zero, we can now look at zero in a new way:

                     We can now ask: What is the mathematical equation for the origin of Existence, and in a flash it comes to us, as it always has, simply and purely as zero. The problem has always been however ..to be able to translate such “Nothingness” into “Somethingness”. We have explored the translation of Inertia into Space-Time and Space-Time into Energy and Mass, and so we have a fundamental understanding of what “Nothingness” is and how it becomes “Somethingness”. But we have barely touched upon the spark, that Transcendence, that starts the mechanism of Inertia into be-ing and simultaneously within that function to act upon itself.

Let us now explore in depth the switch that turns Existence on

                     We have seen that a Wholeness has a tension to it that keeps it bound to itself. It is this tension that communicates the need for equilibrium throughout a Wholeness and therefore drives the Wholeness to act upon and translate/interpenetrate itself to form a dynamic, self-diversifying infrastructure.

If the Tension of Wholeness upon itself does all of this,
may it not also initiate the process – the Tension 
and the Wholeness being one and the same?

                      Below is a simple zero, a “Nothingness”, and like the “directionless motion” that we ascribe to the Wholeness of Existence, we give one a neutral charge of equally balanced plus and minus. But we must now ask, does “charge” also exist in zero, or is zero a lack of charge, but a potential that charge may be formed of? It would not matter how many charges of plus and minus we ascribe to zero for as long as they are equally balanced, they still leave an empty, motionless static condition, a null charge within our conception. We can see a similarity between this model of zero and our concept of a vacuum or the Void.

                      Now the question is raised, if zero is a balanced null charge or only a potential of charge, why would zero be anything but vacuous? How would it begin to self-diversify to become “One” or Existence?

                      The answer lies within the intrinsic Tension of Wholeness that zero is, in that its own potentiality causes it to deform,

And charge is thus created

                     And charge is only charge in relation to other and opposite charge. When zero is deformed, charge is created and boundaries of charge form within the Void that zero is. The directionless flow of Existence is actually interactive charge within zero ..within “Nothingness”.

                     We consider zero as vacuous, as empty, as consisting of nothing. But zero must also considered to be whole, for how can it not be, as it is a perfect Void. What is the nature of zero? It is a vacuous condition that draws upon itself from every part of itself and represents itself to our perception as a Spherical Void of Nothingness ..and when we write a zero – O - we symbolically represent the vacuous sphericity of the Void. We are now led to ask, “What are the properties of a vacuous sphere, or from an alternate conception, a Concavity of Equilibrium?” ..and the function of leaps out, dragging with it every other irrational, transcendental number of which the Void consists. The numbers are called “irrational” because they seem irrational, but they are actually translations of the deeper reality, expressions of the undivided transcendent Wholeness of which Existence truly consists.

                     The nature of , the nature of a transcendental number, is the fact of being “transcendental”, a largely ignored property of a Wholeness. There it is, right under our noses, what it is that gets Existence going, what it is that is the spark that causes “Nothingness” to morph into “Somethingness”.

The intrinsic nature of a Wholeness is that its tension upon itself
is greater than can be measured by the sum of its parts
..because the natural deformation of a Wholeness
intrinsically drives it into undivided differentiation.

                     When the entirety of a Wholeness is considered, a new aspect of the Wholeness arises with its Totality! It comes fundamentally packaged in its own unique way.

A Wholeness is always greater than the sum of its parts!
(hence the generation of transcendental numbers)

                     Its tension upon itself is greater than the tensions of each of its parts. Here is how this works:

The parts of a Wholeness are undivided from the Whole

                     Since we are dealing with a sphere, every part of it is curved. As soon as we try to measure a curvature, comes into play and we can only get a transcendental expression of each of its parts, because each of its parts are curved. When we add them together however, their sum always comes out as less than the whole. If we try to get around this by measuring squares within the sphere, we are left with curved remainders of the sphere. If we measure smaller and smaller squares within the remainders, we go on measuring forever. Hence, the wholeness of existence is naturally ongoing, evolving, changing - within and of itself - driven by its own intrinsic transcendental qualities.

Return to Table of Contents Return to Presentation Page
Do you have a suggestion about or criticism of this page? Please send us an Email