Concepts of “Beginning” and “End”,

“Before and “After”

Time – “is”…

Because “Time” is the Tensor Field
of Primary Consciousness

Space – “is”…

Because Space is Time stressed

Being – “is”…

Because Being is the translation of time stressed, to the experience
by “time”, (Primary Consciousness as the “Void”), of itself.

                    As a medium experiencing itself, Primary Consciousness as the “Void” or “Nothingness” is instantaneous and spaceless, but through its implicit aspect of experiential self-encounter, Primary Consciousness may interpret itself through animate extensions of itself as being “Time-full” and “Space-full”. The Void as it is, has no beginning or end through its convoluted circumference, but through its tension upon itself, because of its experience of itself, translations of processes into further processes, which may be interpreted as beginnings and endings as limitations do occur. When we see a plant grow from a seed to a flower and then wither away, we interpret this process as having a beginning, a period of existence and then an end. But of course, the genetic structure of the seed was generated prior to its growth, the flower was part of an ongoing process …and when it withered, the process did not actually stop. That which was the flower has continued without interruption as the elements that were contained within the flower now nourish other plants. The entirety of this process has no “beginning” or “ending” and is therefore concurrent. Because we experience beginnings and endings of events within our neurological reality and because we interpret Primary Consciousness as “Time passing”, we mistakenly develop the notion that time may have a beginning and an end, when in fact “Time”… just is. We travel in our car from here to there and this takes time. Well, if we increase our speed, less “time” is taken. What we are really doing is - propagating as Localized Consciousness - through Primary Consciousness, through “Time”. When “Time” is propagated through by a distortion of itself such as our car and ourselves, it is interpreted as space with time passing because “Time”, the Tensor Field of Primary Consciousness, is being stressed. 

                    We perceive a beginning and an end to our trip and imagine that a segment of time has passed when in fact it is we who are passing through “Time”.

                    Our experience of time through an interruptive Animate Interface gives us the notions of beginning and end because we see existence as composed of things that are separate from each other and from ourselves. Through this interpretation, we have developed the evolved notions of before and after. Primary Consciousness however, is composed of a Tensor Field that emanates perceptions of itself through its own experience of itself, through its own tension upon itself. It is therefore, concurrently of itself and is not anything else. 

                    Time and space do not exist except as perceptions through expressions of Primary Consciousness evolved to cognizance, (such as we), interpreting the Void from which they extend. The perception of the separation of “Space” and “Time” only manifests when an expression of Primary Consciousness, as a Localized cognizant extension of itself, sees itself through an interface, (a further expression), composed of itself. Through such intricate twists and turns of itself, Primary Consciousness allows the perception of beginning and end, but the beginning and end are only views of Primary Consciousness compounded of itself. In a less compounded form, without the restrictions imposed upon Localized Consciousness by an Animate Interface, there would be no notion of time passing, because the interpretation by Primary Consciousness of itself would be of its own singular unification, compounded as it is. 

                    What we imagine then as the beginning of the Universe, is our perception of Primary Consciousness having reached a level of compoundment, (our Universal Span), that would allow a unique analyzable interpretation of Primary Consciousness as a history, in a sensible way through an interfacial extension of itself.

Each of us, as a connected part of Primary Consciousness,
IS Primary Consciousness in its entirety

                    Through deep meditation, we are capable of discounting our bodies and therefore, our senses, allowing a direct experience of our true extensity. We may each see ourselves as the “Void”, from what we perceive as its outer perimeter to its center.

                    The Animate Interface is the result of the “Void’s” comprehension of itself, extending itself towards further comprehension. Comprehension then is the “Void’s” experience of itself as an instantaneous, spaceless, sizeless Tensor Field displaying within its own view …as “Time”, “Space” and “Existence”, through localized cognizant extensions of itself. Primary Consciousness is instantaneous, spaceless and sizeless except when in comprehension of itself. As Primary Consciousness comprehends itself into “Existence”, the Tensor Field of the “Void” manifests as omnidirectional expression through self-interpretation.

                    The Scientist sees this as the expanding Universe born of the “Big Bang”. The Theologian sees this as the “Word of God” having created a “World”. If both concepts are dialogically combined, they become - “The Primordial Force expressed through the “Big Bang” diversified into a self-encountering, self-experiential Unity of which we are an undivided part - that within its own self-encounter, comprehends itself through its intrinsic language of the Tension of its own Wholeness upon itself”.

                    In the macrological view, (interpreting through our senses), we see the Universe within which we exist, expanding outward and away from us. As evolved extensions of Primary Consciousness we view back through “Time” …back through the Tensor Field of our “evolution”.

                    We were Primary Consciousness before the Animate Interface evolved. We were Primary Consciousness before the stars that we perceive were formed. We are Primary Consciousness itself, “evolved” to contiguous diversity through the Inertial Tension of the Multiverse upon itself. Stars come and go, but the stars that we perceive are part of our localized evolution. What we see of the start of the Universe is the “beginning” of the diversification into our Universal Span, but we …were, before this “beginning”, as we were and always have been …Primary Consciousness in comprehension of itself. 

                    Within the Universe that we currently perceive, the stars that are in our view are our interpreted history. Did stars exist prior to our localized view of them? – Of course. - but what we currently see we interpret from the furthest perimeter of our own being, (ourselves as undivided from the Void), to ourselves, (as diversified, individually centered, localized extensions of it).

The Trans-Emanation of Primary Consciousness

                    As the total volume of the “Space”, (we may also interpret “Space” as Syntactic Content), of the Universe grew larger, it was filled with the distortions, (enormous quantities of energy and matter – the matter being primarily hydrogen, some of which formed into helium through the pressure of expansion), generated by its original “compressed” state, (that which science describes as the “Big Bang”). 

                    As space expanded, (“Time” as an expression of the Tensor Field of the Void, became less stressed), fewer distortions were produced, not because space-time stopped encroaching upon itself, but because space–time was less compressed. (“Space” is “Time” stressed). What we perceive as “Time” is one of our unique interpretations of the “substance” of Primary Consciousness. When “Time”, as the Inertial Tensor Field of Primary Consciousness is stressed, “Space-Time” is the result. Space-Time being the matrix of force we call electromagnetism, when stressed, manifests as the higher states of existence, as energy and matter, (braided, interwoven electromagnetism). In order for a distortion of Space-Time to continue to exist as matter, it must be forced into a, “material state of existence”. A material state of existence requires a minimum threshold of “Time”- /Spatial distortion. The energies required that would produce such a state, (a state that would produce hydrogen for instance), rarely manifest in the Universe as it now exists, (at least from our limited point of view), although prior material states generated from the compressed period continue to exist and further translate into the various elements through the fusion and nova processes of stars. The intensity of “Time” wrapped up as a distortion of the Inertial Tensor Field, determines how long that distortion will last. As a MathMass, in the hyper-compressed area of the Void, as the “beginning” of our Universal Span, distortions of that area, (tightly woven compounds of “Time”), were formed in such density that they continued their existence into what we now perceive as the present and in theory will continue their existence into what we imagine as the future. A proton, which has a theorized lifetime of billions of years, is in fact a compressed distortion of “Time” that will take, (from our perspective), billions of years to uncompress. The uncompressing appears to happen in a moment however, instantaneously, because when “Time” decompresses, it merely undistorts’ as part of the instantaneous Unified Tensor Field that is the Void.

                    Within our macrological, “classical” interpretation of the Universe, science has determined that the Universe was generated from the “Big Bang” – and that this event took place approximately 15 billion years ago. Science has admitted however, that there are a number of problems with this analysis. One of the most obvious conflicts within this universal “time” model is the varied lifetimes of protons. Protons have a specific lifetime built into their structure. We see however that some protons are always spontaneously going out of existence. How is this possible if all protons were created at a specific time during the Big Bang? The fact that protons continually, spontaneously go out of existence suggests that some protons that currently exist within our Universal Span were created before the period of what science interprets as the “Big Bang”. The “Big Bang” theory as it stands today begs for reinterpretation. (Further into this writing we will continue to reinterpret the “Big Bang” theory in greater detail). But simply however, the interpenetration of unlimited Universal Spans would explain the varying ages of different protons existing within our span.

                    A quantum packet of energy or particle of matter is discrete in its existence, (it exists as a fixed distortion extended from the greater totality of the matrix of Space-Time), because the force that created it, (convoluted “Time”), became it …and remained so as the dynamic and volumetric aspects of its existence. Although such distortions may strain to unwind, the maintenance of their internal dynamics only requires the minimal expansion/contraction force of the greater matrix of Space-Time that they are extended from to maintain their integrity. Such effect is always being applied by the expansion/contraction of Space-Time, (the omni-directional tension of wholeness of the Void), to maintain the states of existence of its distortions.

                    Since Space-Time is expanding/contracting in all directions at once, Space-Time is always encroaching upon itself, maintaining a continuous translation of its distortions into further patterns of existence. As change is always taking place, the dynamic existence of the total matrix of Space-Time proceeds through such trans-emanation.

Yada-yada-yada becomes reality…

                    The trans-emanation of Space-Time is the waveform of Primary Consciousness, (the manifestation of Will - to Be - of the Void), expressed as the totality of existence. We detect this waveform as the 3k-radiation background manifesting throughout the heavens. In the early 1960’s, Bell Laboratories detected three degrees Kelvin of heat radiating throughout all of space and this detected radiation, interpreted by science as an echo of the original creation of the Universe, served as evidence to support the Big Bang theory. At that same time, the famous astronomer, Fred Hoyle was proposing the Universe to be a steady state system, always having been existent. The Big Bang theory and the Steady State theory were so opposed to each other in concept that no compromise could be made between the two. Because of the discovery of the background 3k-radiation and of other indications that supported the Big Bang theory, Fred Hoyle suffered a loss of credibility within the scientific community. All at once, the Steady State was tossed out and the Big Bang was in. Fred Hoyle saw a Universe continually renewing itself, providing the hope of unlimited accomplishment for the future. The Big Bang brought with it implications of doom. It suggested the eventual demise of the Universe through either its expansion going on forever, leaving every star within its own black Void or of gravity finally catching up with expansion, eventually drawing the Universe back into a crushing non-existence, taking all life and all accomplishment with it. What Fred Hoyle saw as a hopeful Universe propagating unlimited accomplishment was not inconsistent with the Big Bang theory if that “bang” would only be considered within the context of a Multiversal system such as described herein. 

                    But there is more to this: something happened within the Multiverse that altered its perception of its experience of itself, and that event ever maturing, has become the basis of what we perceive to be the “intelligence” of the Void. In the chapters to follow we will explore in great detail the intricate process of this great awakening, but for now let us continue with the “science of space-time, matter and motion”.

The Mechanics of Synchronicity

                    Einstein once alluded to an aspect of dualism, that of non-locality, (something happens here and elsewhere that appears to be relational, but without any detectable connection of cause and effect), as “Spooky Action” at a distance. There would have to be some form of communication or connection between the two occurrences in order for them to actually be relational, but if they happen far enough apart from each other and quick enough in relation to each other, EM radiation traveling between them at the speed of light, as the fastest communicator possible, would not be able to travel fast enough between the two, (in theory), to make the connection of communication possible. (Refer back to the electron twins, light years apart. If one spins left, the other “instantly knows” to spin right). How was it then that each of those electrons could possibly know in which direction the other was spinning? The only resolution is that photons might be able to travel short periods back in “Time” to provide communication between paired though “non-local” electrons. If then what we perceive as “Time” is actually our experience of the undivided sizeless, instantaneous, inertial tensor field of existence, our interpretation of the “motion” of both photons and electrons are actually our neurological perceptions through distortions of “Inertia/ Time”. When what we perceive as existence is interpreted from this perspective, we are then able to build a conceptual foundation from which to resolve the phenomenon of “Spooky action”.

                    The Tensor Field of “Time”, (the wholeness of existence as inertia in self-encounter/ self-penetration), thereby forms an infrastructure of distortions of itself. Distortions of the “Void” evolved to cognizance, (such as we), experience the weakest, (baseline), “self-experience”/ trans-emanation of the Void as “Time” passing as we propagate through it. The baseline trans-emanation of “time”/inertia is the threshold of the manifestation of existence – of the least compounded interpenetration of “time”/inertia upon itself. We interpret such “time” in its weakest intensity of self-tension as space-time, except when further distorted by matter exhibiting an effect upon surrounding space-time that we interpret as gravity. Matter is tightly wound up “Time” and if “Space” is “Time” in tension with itself, then matter in the secondary view is wound up “space-time” and ultimately as simply as wound up “time”. 

                    Tensioned “Time” therefore, manifests as spatial existence, as the volume of the dynamism of the interpenetration of the Void, that “volume” a translation of the dynamism manifested as a weak electromagnetic grid that displays inertial properties when encountered or compounded. Tensioned “Time” therefore, exhibiting as “Space-Time” is the threshold of the condition that we perceive as “Existence”, as a higher or more complex state of “Nothingness”. (So obvious is the structure of “Being” that we miss the simplicity of it. If we imagine a point/instant, a “fluxion”, looking upon it through our mind’s eye, we see it as spaceless, sizeless and therefore as the beginning or end of time, as the beginning or end of our Universe, but if we look through it as an undivided part of it, we see it as the perpetuity, substance and diversity of existence! …As “Time/Universe” without end.)

                    “Time” is the dynamic property of existence and “Space-Time” is the compound of this dynamic expressed as the dynamic/volumetric process, > the dualistic point/instant – as the cause within effect properties of existence. The threshold criterion of existence therefore, is what we perceive as the “speed”, (the translation of dynamism into “volume”), of the expression of the Universe. The translational “velocity” of the trans-emanation of dynamism, of this “expansion”, is what we interpret as the speed of light. The speed of light therefore is the baseline velocity, a translation of the trans-emanation of Space-Time. The translational process of the Void however, is actually speed-less - instantaneous. 

                    So, how can a limited “speed” of light exist within an instantaneous process? The simple answer is that we see the instantaneous process from within itself and so perceive it as “timeful”, as motion. From a neurological point of view the speed of light is our interpretation of the relationship between the instantaneous trans-emanation of space-time and a compound of that trans-emanation, (an electron or photon), propagating through space-time. Until energy becomes mass, (a quantum leap to a higher complexity of space-time), energy translates through space-time as a distinct complex process of space-time. Since it is not yet mass, EM radiation is limited to a complexity just above space-time and just below mass. Bounded as it is, it is limited to a specific rate of translation through the Void. Since we neurologically split space-time into “time” and “space” we are able to calculate the process of a photon, or an electron as propagating through space over time at a specific velocity, (its bounded complexity). But this of course is a mathematical construct of our neurological “worldview”. Mass, as a higher complexity is perceived through our neurological interpretation to move slower. 

                    (We perceive instantaneity/concurrency through the complexity of neurological mass and therefore such neurological complexity places limitations upon how we perceive the varied processes of the unified field of existence. Both the speed of light and absolute zero therefore are the extreme limitations of our perception of instantaneous existence as it actually is, of existence at the quantum level interpreted through classical vision). 

                    With this understanding in place, let us now interpret “speed” through the instantaneous looking glass of the Fluxion:

                    A Fluxion is spaceless and instantaneous, but it self-encounters and thus self-experiences and therefore creates an infrastructure within and of itself that is perceived as a space-time “world” by cognizant space-time splitting extensions, (such as we), undivided from that infrastructure. Since the infrastructure of the Fluxion in fact constitutes the Fluxion, the Fluxion translates itself from the infinitesimal, (the Fluxion itself), to the infinite, (the infrastructure) …and back, simultaneously. This is instantaneity …and within the infrastructure of the instantaneous Fluxion this is how it processes: On a sunny day for all to see, a crystal ball is dropped from a tower. In the first second the ball falls 16 feet and in the next second it falls an additional 48 feet. Dropped again and again it is witnessed by the populace to repeat this exact mathematical process. Of course they are viewing the proceeding through a cerebral reconstruction, a neurological synthesis, but no matter, because the math will inexorably reveal an inner process... In the first second, it falls 16 feet and in the next 48, for a total of 64 feet over two seconds, and we therefore surmise that distance equals Time squared. How?.. Like this – in the last second of 2 seconds our crystal ball drops 48 ft. The square of 2 seconds is 4, times the 16 feet fallen in the first second and comes out to 64 feet fallen over two seconds, (16 + 48 feet). In three seconds our ball will have fallen 9X16 feet, (the square of 3 seconds of time = 9, multiplied by 16 feet), for a total of 144 feet, an actual drop of 80 feet in the third second. We surmise through our neurological synthesis therefore, that accelerating speed represents distance traveled through time squared and we express this algebraically as DT2, (distance X time squared). But this expression is somehow lacking as we only have a description of how far our ball has fallen and how fast it is accelerating over a given span of neurological time, but not how fast it is moving/ translating/changing, instantaneously. Hence, we need a way to describe looking through an infinitesimally small increment of time to judge the velocity of the moment.

                    What exists below space-time? – nothing! …as it is what we perceive as “nothing” that interpenetrates itself to create the dynamism of volume that space-time is. So we therefore know that “nothing” is other than what we perceive it to be. 

                    What is the “speed” of nothing? –Zero! What is the “speed” of “nothing” in self-encounter expressing as space-time? – It must be a number above zero, …but what number? 

                    This number must somehow represent the process that generates the wholeness of existence, including its infrastructure. Since this number is generated from zero to just above zero it must be smaller than any other numbers above it. So, what is the smallest number? Is it .000001? – Nope. We can add zeros to infinity, always generating smaller numbers, and yet just above zero exists the smallest number. That number exists because infinite zeros added to the left of 1, manifest the “infinitesimal”. How can we numerically represent this infinitesimal?

We can express it with a symbol - – and that is the number!

Now, is dynamic it’s that infinitesimal Fluxion in self-encounter within which its infrastructure infinitely expresses as varied and unique patterns of existence all limited to the finite confines of the Fluxion itself – as the Fluxion and its infrastructure are one and the same.

One
 and the same!

                    All of existence is contained within an infinitesimal and is bounded by the infinitesimal and that boundary therefore represents all that there is …and that we will represent by the symbol - , which in this case equals 1 as a limit to the wholeness of the Fluxion, and simultaneously as , as the infrastructure encompassing and encompassed, and therefore experiencing itself, expressing within and of itself all of the fractions/patterns/ processes of existence that could ever be. So in order to get the baseline instantaneous translational velocity of the Fluxion, which is both and we must reduce to an instant in time and a point in space, the “speed” of our crystal ball ...to find its instantaneous velocity. We are now looking for an equation that simultaneously describes both the instantaneous position and momentum of an object. (Whoops – the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is glaring at us – but we shall nevertheless overcome). The ball is falling to our neurological perception, accelerating through space and time, one point after another in space, one instant after another in time …DT². That’s the neurological distance fallen through “time” squared. But what of instantaneous position at instantaneous time? Let’s lose the 2 and represent instantaneous time as just DT. 

                    Ok, now the instantaneous position of our crystal ball, we’ll represent as DY. …And finally, for the instantaneous position of our crystal ball in instantaneous time, logic dictates that we divide DY by DT. We can plainly see that instantaneity is in itself dynamic as it is represented mathematically by the expression of the infinitesimal acting upon itself –DY/DT …a point acted upon by an instant. Now, where can that point go if the time within which that point must travel is instantaneous? It cannot go anywhere, but DT is still nevertheless acting upon DY, so what is happening? DY is “happening”. DY is changing …instantaneously. What kind of change? – DY is doing the only thing that it can …it is curving in place …and that curvature is the translation of “time” into dynamic “volume” as the expression of “space-time”, curved. 

                    Well, we got ahead of ourselves a little, (very little since we are dealing with an infinitesimal), because if you will remember, we started with an object of mass dropped from a tower resting on the mass of the Earth. (…not to forget that we are actually leading up to an explanation of how those electrons know which way to spin). These factors of mass and therefore gravity alter our equations a bit, making them somewhat more complex, but if we remove the Earth, tower and crystal ball and just consider the instantaneous “velocity” of the self-interpenetration of “nothingness” into space-time, we can represent this process as… 

DY/DT== ei+1=0.

good grief…

                    Ok, let’s break it down: DY/DT represents an infinitesimal acting upon itself, as that Fluxion concept that we keep running into. Now, what is happening to the infinitesimal as it acts upon itself? What is happening to the all of it and what is happening to its infrastructure? 

                    Let be the all of it and / represent the infrastructure. So, the “all” acts upon itself generating an infrastructure within itself …and of itself. Thus the infrastructure acts as well upon the “all” as /. (Believe it or not, this symbolic function actually says that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts).

                    The dynamics of this process is expressed wholly and internally, (the “all” and the infrastructure), as ei+1=0, or stretched out a little can be written eI=-1+1=0. 

                    It was back in the 1700’s that Leonhard Euler found the basis, the unifying mathematical expression that linked logarithmic functions to exponential functions and thus exposed a key component of the Cosmos. Revealed as the transcendental number 2.71828… it was given the symbol e. Starting with e, the 2 being two parts of 1 as in “nothingness” in self-encounter generating that infinitesimal Fluxion, (the wholeness of 1), and the decimal of .71828… being the perpetual dynamic of that experience, (the ever-becoming infrastructure of 1), Euler went on to link the transcendent expressions of the Void in the equation above which describes the process of the Void’s self-encounter mathematically as e or 2.71828… taken to the power of as 3.14159… times i as the square root of minus one. As we work our way through the formula, ei actually yields minus one. The formula says then that the square root of –1 is squared through this process. This suggests a hidden reciprocity to the Multiverse because the formula goes on to say that –1+1=0. Zero now represents the point at which “nothingness” self-encounters to form space-time, the yin and yang of the whole interpenetrating, still a wholeness, a oneness, of which its duality, (-1 and +1), form an ordered infrastructure through which cognizant beings dwelling within perceive the totality of ordered existence as the “all”, (1), and the interpenetrating dynamic substructure as “nothing”, (0), and the interim of the equation, i+1, through sequential neurological synthesis, as the objects, energies and situations of everyday life.

                    When Space-Time is formed due to the Voids’ tension upon itself, (which always is), the baseline of what we interpret as “speed” is created because what we interpret as “Space” is created, this baseline then being the instantaneous velocity of translation/trans-emanation of Inertia/“Time”, (the Fluxion), through and of itself. Because “space/speed” is created when “Time” self-interpenetrates, we interpret Existence and all of its infrastructural patterns as having velocity/motion. The Universe/Multiverse, (space/time), in its entirety therefore, “moves” directionlessly at instantaneous “speed”, but when parts of it are distorted into energy or mass, those translations of higher complexity appear to us through the added complexity of our interfacial senses and brain to “move slower” than the baseline and therefore stand out, within our neurological perception, against the baseline from which they extend. Photons, (quanta of energy), propagate instantaneously through the Void at the baseline velocity and when interpreted through animate matter or through our secondary devices, (laboratory instruments), are given a perceptual “speed” in relation to the complexity of the observer. (The speed of light is zero when unobserved and it is the ultimate speed when observed). Since light is propagating at the baseline velocity however, it has no actual “speed”. 

                    Our animate forms on the other hand are constructed of matter, of more highly distorted “Time” …as “Time” more tightly wrapped …and so we perceive ourselves and our instruments through imagery, as propagating “slower” than the baseline velocity, because it is we who give direction/speed to what we observe through our comprehension of directionless processes. Because of this perception, we attribute a conceptual “speed” to light because our concept of existence is based upon what we perceive from the perspective of our individually compacted “Time” bodies and brains. 

                    Localized Consciousness perceiving through the compacted “Time” of the Animate Interface interprets itself as “moving slower” than the baseline from which it extends because localized consciousness is an ordered extension. Through “Time” localization, (“Time” contraction – “Time” compaction), the imaged perception by Localized Consciousness of the “slower movement” of material forms, relative to the baseline velocity of the Void, is merely the imaged sensibility of greater and lessor complexities of the inertial processes of the Void in relation to each other and in relation to ourselves. What we perceive as synchronicity, non-locality and “spooky action” of apparently non-local events is derived through the perception of Localized Consciousness, as an imaged illusion.

                    When matter is formed, the baseline inertial forces that such matter is constructed of are contained within that matter, as “Time” compacted into what we perceive as “materiality”. 

                    Quanta of energy braid into “matter” and because of such braiding, advance their combined form as a more complex state of existence. In the deeper reality, the braiding process that forms matter is the compacting of “Time”. The baseline “speed” of the energy thus braided is manifested internally within the matter that it has become. The complex energy-state that has become the material form is still propagating at the “speed” of light, but is now propagating …in place …because the energy, which is “Time” stressed, is now localized. The observation of such “positioning” and “dimensionality” is an illusion because such imaged perceptions can only be made through a relative complex state, the Animate Interface, (also illusory), as a braided and therefore perceptually illusioned “slower” state of existence. Additionally, we are observing through just that, an information interface, whose sensory and interpretive devices allow the forces and contortions of the Void to be perceived as sense-ably macro-logic-al, (sense-logic), within our own interpretation, as “positioning and dimensionality”. The two material states, that of the Animate Interface of the observer and that which is observed, (a rock for instance), are actually undivided interactive complex energy fields, (distortions of the Void), extended from the baseline of “Time”.

                    Our perception of the Void as “Time” is made possible because we observe the Void as being segmented even though it is wholly undivided. We are able to perceive in this way because our perceptions are that of superimposed imagery, sensibilities made of perception through the translating functions of the Animate Interface. We break the Void up into individual parts through our imaged interpretations when it is in fact a unified, but diversified totality. The Void however, at the quantum level is instantaneous – a cause within its own effect, as the Void is a totality undivided. Because our animate forms are mass extensions of the Void, as a greater complexity than its baseline, we observe the baseline of the Void differentially from the perspective of and in relation to our own “braided” complexity. Our braided material forms are the interfacial shells through which the non-braided quantum properties of unified “Time” become localized and “individualized” and enabled’ to experience itself macrologically as a Universe. Being “in place”, as we are, we therefore interpret the speedless baseline as being in “motion” through our observation of it through our own complexity.

                    Material forms, (including our interfacial bodies), because of their braided complexity, are perceived to be “moving in place”. There is no real “movement” however within the Tensor Field. There is only the perceptual imaging of Inertial Distortioning that gives us the notion that things are in motion or at rest. There is no size to the Void, except through our imaged perceptions of its diversified processes. When we try to perceive below the macrological view, below that to which our senses are attuned, our concepts of space, time, position and momentum begin to lose cohesiveness. The more intense our measurement below this classical view, the more we must approximate reality and existence. When we try to measure at the quantum level, we leave materiality behind altogether and thus engage the Void through our own function of “macro-imaging” …but at the Voids’ quantum level of its own true reality. We then find that we the measurers are measuring through a shell vision of our own complexity.

                    Our function of imaging requires that we perceive materiality, space, time, position and motion, but at the quantum level no such forces exist. We imagine forces at the quantum level to be highly complex only because our function of imagery is highly complex. Through an imagery process that is structured for the macroscopic view, our comprehension of existence at the Voids’ quantum level breaks down altogether, leaving the Void in its essential form …and in our view as “nothingness”. When we conceptually enter an area where imagery breaks down, we perceive the breakdown as complexity. The Void at its baseline form however, is not complicated. We just see it that way because in relation to it …we are.

                    When a photon is formed, we perceive that the photon does not accelerate from zero to the speed of light, but that the photon starts out moving at the speed of light. That is because a photon is generated from the baseline of omnidirectional universal expansion, which is already “moving”, (within our perception), at this speed. What we call a “speed” at the baseline is not a speed however, - it is instantaneity – the directionless reciprocity of the tension of the Unified Field. That is why photons start out moving at the “speed” of the baseline. It is not that they are moving faster than we or faster than other material objects, they are not “moving” at all. We and other material compoundments of the Void are of greater complexity than the baseline and therefore we perceive ourselves and other material objects as “moving slower”. The reason that the “speed” of light is stable is because the speed of light is actually zero.

                    Photons are representations of “time” at the baseline of “time”. Not actually moving, they are perceived as moving through the imagery superimposed upon them by material complexities such as we. Never having actually moved, they may appear in our perception to go back to their source of emission and then be re-emitted. In our view, having been “conceptually” re-emitted in the “past”, the same photon can appear in two different places at the same time in the present …and of course, both photon representations will be spinning in opposite directions, such opposed “spin” the result of the reciprocity of the interpenetration of Inertia at the baseline of space-time. This principle holds true for all dualistic functions of self-experience. The created moment that “Nothingness” forms and experiences, is a directionless “Time” process, (distribution of tension throughout the Inertial Tensor Field), that allows “Nothingness” to exist in relation to itself. It is not actually movement within itself, it is greater and lessor comprehension/ translation of itself. This is what Consciousness does – it comprehends and translates, and by perception through an Animate Interface, interprets its own comprehension as “motion”. 

                    The interpretation of “motion” requires that a relative medium of existence must also be interpreted. Consciousness perceiving through an interface sees its own extensity therefore, as space, time, energy matter and “motion”– as a Universe.

   
Press Control-D to bookmark this page

Return to Table of Contents Return to Presentation Page
Do you have a suggestion about or criticism of this page? Please send us an Email

Think you can improve the readability of this page?

Click for Details Online Editing or Offline Editing

Your Editorial Contributions are welcome!

To Edit this Page Online
Click Here

If sending improved Graphics please send as a separate Email with Graphic File attachments, Jpeg or Gif,  no larger than 10K per Graphic. If sending Mathematical Symbols please send as a separate Email. Please include your True Type Math Font as an email attachment. Please send all Emails containing Graphics or Math Symbols to; Editor@Primordality.com.

Return to Page Navigation