The perception of discontinuity creates the illusion of the “present” – the perception of an existence as an individual between “Times” because Primary/Localized Consciousness focused through a disruptive interface interprets as an illusion, separation between itself and that which it perceives. Localized Consciousness receiving a continual interruption of perception through the Animate Interface, applies a continuing image of that interruption, ever changing, as point/instants to whatever may be further perceived. The reason that Localized Consciousness uses point/instants as an applied image to what it perceives is because it receives a varying frequency of interruptions of information …a digital coding, (The foundational code of the Primordial Force that is the extensity of Localized Consciousness itself), through the Animate Interface, that must be interpreted/decoded by similarly applied imagery. 

                    Simply put, all that Localized Consciousness can possibly know through the reprocessing device of the Animate Interface is the frequency of interruptions, (coded data), between itself and its “environment”. Such digital information received is concurrently imaged into the most logical sensibility possible by molecularly imprinting digital imagery upon the brain's physiological construct and then interpreting the aggregate of the molecular impressions into an image …and then reapplying this ever changing image to further continuing perceptions. In this way, Localized Consciousness maintains the continuity of its perception of Primary Consciousness, (in the final analysis - the foundational perception of itself), as its “environment” through the interruptive nature of the Animate Interface while sequentially interpreting that information into sensibility through a revolving process of re-imaging.

                    The Animate Interface, as a unique window/lens to experience, would appear to present a formidable and paradoxical task to the ability of Localized Consciousness to interpret its “environment”. Localized Consciousness however, does not see this task as formidable because the intrinsic nature of Primary Consciousness, in any form that it may present itself, is that of willfulness. Such willfulness allows Localized/ Primary Consciousness the inquisitive ability to get around obstacles, (this is the basis of curiosity and creativity – the search for knowledge driven by the Tension of Wholeness by the Unified Field upon itself). 

                    Localized/Primary Consciousness got around the obstacle of the Animate Interface by evolving the Interface for its own use while focused through it, and thus created the tools that would enable perception of indirect experience. Through continuous though indirect experiential encounter, Localized Consciousness refines the imagery of sensibility by imprinting molecular formations, (images), to the brain, of the digitized interruptions that it receives through the senses of the Animate Interface. Localized Consciousness then re-interprets those formations and projects the interpretation upon further experience. By continually re-imaging its interpretation in this way, Localized Consciousness makes into sensible imagery and sequential continuity that which it interprets, re-images and perceptually projects back out onto the “Void” as “Time, Space, Objects and Waveforms, as its perceived environment. The interpretation by Localized Consciousness of experience is re-imprinted upon the brain, re-retrieved and re-projected in a continuing, revolving process of the imaging into sensibility, (the making of cerebral “reality”), of the foundational code of its own extensity, (of Primary Consciousness, the Totality from which the “Soul” extends). 

                    The application of digitized imagery creates a perceptual three-dimensional grid of point/instants within which the more intensified convolutions of Primary Consciousness appear as dimensioned materiality and the less intensified convolutions are interpreted as dimensioned space. Comprehension through this grid is interpreted as “motion” through “space “ while “time” is passing. What is actually happening however is that Localized Consciousness does not actually “move”, but comprehends its extensity, interpreting the convolutions of the “Void” in a focused, but indirect way. 

                    As a part of Primary Consciousness, Localized Consciousness expands and contracts its view, (like focusing through a variable lens), of its “environment” through digitized imagery. The “view” by the Soul is focused through the sensory devices, (lens), of its Animate Interface, which gives this view, “direction”. In the direction of its view, what appears to be the motion of the Animate Interface is actually the indirect comprehension by Localized Consciousness expressing into Primary Consciousness. What appears to be motion is merely a change of the oriented perception of localized Consciousness as part of Primary Consciousness. 

                    Since Localized Consciousness extends from the whole of Primary Consciousness, there is no actual movement, but the translations of the polarities of the Tensor Field of the Wholeness of Primary Consciousness, (the exchange of data/in-tension), is experienced as “motion” by a perceiving extension of itself focused through an interface that provides information to it in an indirect and reprocessed way. 

                    The experience of “motion” therefore is just the “change of view” between the cognizant observer as Localized Consciousness and the greater totality of Primary Consciousness from which the localized observer extends – a trans-emanation of perception – a duality of view. The view is dualistic in that Primary Consciousness “sees” itself through the interface of the localized observer. The “picture” that Primary Consciousness “sees” is a localized illusion of itself, an oriented view. Since we are doing the seeing, we are Primary Consciousness perceiving itself/ourselves through multiplistic localizations of itself/ourselves. Since each multiplicity is oriented differently from all others, we each see this “environment” from a different perspective, from a different frame of reference …and the whole of Primary Consciousness synchronously “sees” itself from all perspectives. As stated at the beginning of this writing – “You are the Universe seeing itself through the eyes of an infinite number of animate beings”.

                    Our individual views of Primary Consciousness therefore, are interpretations of localized multiplicity. In simple terms this means that in order to “see” dimensionality and motion, we “see” simultaneously through the totality of Primary Consciousness, (our minds extend into the “environment”), - and the “environment” sees through us. We localize this perception to where we believe we are, as our localized Consciousness/Perception is focused through our animate forms. Thus we “see” differentially, thereby perceiving the - concurrency of process …as the sequentiality of form and motion. 

                    An extension of Primary Consciousness focused through an interruptive interface applies its own imagery to the indirect information that it receives to make sense of its perceptions. The expansion/contraction of perception as Primary Consciousness interpreting through a localization of itself is imaged to sensibility as “motion” through “space” over “time”. Such control over the imagery of the point/ instant allows Localized Consciousness to widen the interruption of what is interpreted as the “present” to encompass its field of perception. Between itself and what it perceives, (as all interpretations are ultimately formulated mathematically within the mind), a three-dimensional gridwork of point/instants is laid out, (projected “out there” – but really upon the “projection screen” of the brain), as an imagination upon the perceived convolutions of the “external environment”. The judgement of “Time” over “Space” is thus enabled through this field of interpretation. 

                    Through the application of digitized imagery, choice of action is enabled within the mind view of Localized Consciousness to an interpreted threat or opportunity, or through curiosity/creativity, in that point/instants may be applied through imagery to the perception of the convolutions of Primary Consciousness as “Spatial extension” through “Time” passing. 
The interruption/interpretation of such “Time” into manageable segments, allows the segments, through the application of point/instant imagery, to be used to the localized perceiver’s advantage, in that the localized perceiver can now attempt a change of direction, (localized, dualized contraction or expansion of the Tensor Field of Primary Consciousness), at any point/instant thus applied and then perceived. The application of point/instant imagery is the creation of an illusioned grid through which judgement can be made and upon such judgement, direction/intention can be changed. 

                    What might be considered to be the common “auto-thought”, the automatic processing of direct experiential encounter by Primary Consciousness through its inherent - inertial - stress or “will” upon itself, is therefore interrupted by the reprocessing of such “information” through the Animate Interface, allowing limited “self”-control by Localized Consciousness of such “free will”. If Primary Consciousness is to have unique experience of itself, the Animate Interface is necessary, and as a result sentient beings are created that are capable of limited control over Primary Consciousness – a situation of reciprocity.

                    Through the device of an interface, indirect experience allows the sameness of Primary Consciousness to be interpreted as differentiation by cognizant extensions of itself, such as we and other life forms. The interpretation of differentiation is a unique experience against a background of an indivisible connection to sameness. The Animate Interface evolved to allow the exploration of the properties of Primary Consciousness by Primary Consciousness, through unique localized extensions of itself. It takes a cognizant mind to make a reality and by extending into many cognizant differentiations, Primary Consciousness formed many substructural minds within and of itself, indivisibly connected. Hence through each mind unique interpretations of “reality” can be achieved. What requires exploration …and drives exploration, is the “everywhere/ nowhere” field of Primary Consciousness as the foundation, a naturally existing situation of conditionality, intrinsically imposed upon unconditionality, (of cause within effect), a conditional seeking process through unconditional love, that drives the furtherance of diversification within the wholeness of the Void.

                    Consciousness perceiving itself as sameness is boring, but perceiving through differentiation is exciting. Such excitement (and the anticipation of excitement), is the joy that furthers the evolution of the discovery by Primary Consciousness of itself …through localization's of itself.

                    (As described earlier and as will be explored in greater detail further into this writing, it will be shown that Primary Consciousness, or “the Void” is just that …a mind, whose growing comprehension of itself is generated in levels of rational hierarchy by its extended Souls).
We now begin to see more deeply that all moments of change, (moments of Inertial will), although taking place in no time and therefore in no space at all, may be interpreted as time and space through a cognizant distortion/compound, (such as anyone of us), of the instantaneous moment itself. Here we see that Inertia itself is the Void/Moment – in-tension with itself, manifesting as “Space-Time”, as the multiplicity of point/instants to cognizant distortions/extensions, (ex-tensions –distorted tensions that stand out from a common background), of itself. 

                    Change takes place within the moment, as an instantaneous occurrence that requires no space or time within which to occur. When carefully considered, change is always twofold: A process acting upon itself must diversify in reciprocity while still remaining a process, hence change is always differential though undivided transformation. What we interpret as change is the continual inertial effect of Primary Consciousness acting upon itself. What we perceive as continuity is the perpetuity of instantaneity, of the Inertial Tensor Field of Primary Consciousness effecting distortions upon itself, manifesting within our view as “sequential existence”, extended against the background of the least distorted, ambient field that we interpret as “time”. What we perceive as “Time” is the Void as it is – the foundational wholeness of the Void in trans-emanation, the Virtual Inertial Moment - as Primary Consciousness itself between our perceptions of change, (illusioned segments of “time” passing), and during our perception of no-change, as - ourselves passing through “time” – which in the deeper view is our propagation through the “Void”, and even deeper – as the Void propagating through itself... 

                    The nature of Primary Consciousness is that the “Void”, or “Nothingness” is actually a Field of Inertia that acts upon itself because of the inherent (in-tension, - intention), of its own symmetry of wholeness. Inertia therefore may be interpreted as the force of Will, in its pure and simple form. Its inherent nature is the process of being itself – of Be-ing, (as in continuing to be), by its own experiential self-encounter – driven by its own tension of wholeness. Since there is nothing else to act upon, inertia acts upon itself as the force of will acting upon the force of will ...and that is what Trans-Emanation is …the creating of reciprocal instantaneous undivided diversity within a wholeness by its own self-encounter/self-experience. 

                    When inertia acts upon itself, (the Tensor Field strengthening and weakening in various areas of itself), it generates a process of distortion of itself, creating folds of itself that we perceive as here and there, now and then, this and that, “Space and “Time”. Through further compoundments, Nuclear Strong and Weak forces and Electromagnetism as quanta of energy manifest within our interpretations of it. 

                    Through greater intensifications of electromagnetism, the Matter/Gravity complex is created through translation into the primary element of hydrogen - great quantities of which condense into nebulae that enable the gravitational formation of stars. Finally, through the course of star generation and regeneration, the higher elements that support and form the animate matter through which these processes are locally perceived are compounded into existence. 

                    All of these processes occur because of the Inertial Tensor Field of Primary Consciousness manifesting its intrinsic Will upon itself. Existence is not other than Be-ing – as in to be, continuously. When we see an object relative to ourselves or relative to another object, it continues to do what it was doing, being at relative “rest” or in relative “motion” until disturbed by an “outside” force, (disturbed by another distortion of the Tensor Field). It stays that way because it is ultimately composed of Inertial Moments – moments of Will, Volition, Determination, Being, as distortions of Inertia’s action upon itself manifesting as the object, interpreted as “matter” through living forms used as perceptors by the Inertial Tensor Field …of itself. 

                    When unique perception is added through the construct of Animate matter, we interpret such will as the process of the continuity of objects in existence to remain in existence, and this same process coursing through Animate matter is interpreted as its Will, Intention or Volition …the same substance of “soul” of which the Universe consists. 

                    The Inertial Tensor Field makes its presence known to itself …through all compoundments of itself …upon itself. Its primary, intrinsic nature is unchangeable through all such distortions and compoundments of itself. Such un-changeability of its basic nature that is the change-ability of its structure, is the basis of the continuity of existence.

And here we have the crux of it…

Mercurial change through self-distortion, driven 
by the unwavering property of in-tention.

f(t)=i/c

                    The most advanced GUT’S, (Grand Unification Theories), within the field of physics today, suggest that existence is derived of nothing else but tension acting upon itself to form symmetries, (harmonious self-equivalencies) …and that is what in-tension or will is.

                    The intrinsic nature of Primary Consciousness, the Void – Nothingness or “God”, is that of an Inertial Field – a Tensor Field of Will, that through acting upon itself, represents itself …to us and through us, (as we are a part of it), as all of existence perceived directly and indirectly.

                    We can now comprehend Primary Consciousness as a “willful” medium that acts upon itself to create animate forms as extensions of itself through which it perceives itself. In order to achieve this, Primary Consciousness had to work itself through a maze of “logical” constructs. The first was Space-Time. The next was energy. Then came the formation of energy into the material element of hydrogen and its conversion into other elements. Next came the gravitational concentration of elements into nebulae. Then came the gravitational collapse of nebulae into stars. Next came the explosion of stars, (novae), which further created heavier elements. Finally, the ordering of elements into planets and other “localized environments” where Animate matter could be formed and of course, the actual development of Animate matter itself. 

                    We can see that each step had to follow as a logical progression, that not only was each step predicated upon the previous, but that each of the previous directed the next. (Here is the intelligence and planning of the Primordial Force, spoken of earlier within this writing). This view of logical progression is especially apparent where matter is concerned. When matter was formed in quantity, gravity took control of universal evolution, (directed it), and therefore of the evolution of animate matter as well. Nebulae, stars, planets and life were automatically formed due to the direct influence of gravity, the willful property of the “creative process” explained within this writing as “auto-thought”.

                    The scientist may say that as a matter of natural evolution, the Universe once begun had no choice but to form into what it is and that the forces that brought this about had no willful intention to create a Universe that may incidentally be teeming with life. …But here the Universe is …and here we are… If we look back first to the Void as a willful medium expressing itself through innumerable processes into the matter/gravity complex, we can clearly see from where the willfulness of gravity to carry out a “plan” and the persistence of matter to continue its existence is derived.

                    The logic of Primary Consciousness may seem like mindlessness within our initial interpretation of it, but when we consider that we are extensions of such “mindlessness” …as undivided and wholly connected parts of it, our perception of it must change. In this view, we see the translation of “mindlessness” into mindfulness or “God”, through the evolution of our own beings …through the natural adaptation of the Void itself into cognizant extensions that allow the “view” of it to be interpreted through “our logic” into what we perceive as existence. 
Are we so narrow in our interpretation as to not perceive our own “mindfulness” as an extension of that from which we are wholly undivided?

As a matter of fact - we are narrow minded,
but there is no fault in this

                    We perceive everything through our materially animate, narrowly interfacing senses that interrupt the flow of information that we receive from our greater extensity of Primary Consciousness. Because of this, we see things as separate from ourselves when in fact our senses are looped around our conscious perception, creating the notion within each of us as being disconnected from that which we perceive, when in actuality, we are an undivided part of it. 

                    We get information through the limitation of our senses and because our senses have evolved in a protective way, we are limited to how we are able to perceive and this restricts our perception of our extended existence. This is why we develop secondary devices to judge processes that we cannot normally perceive, such as infrared light that the eye cannot see and sound that the ear cannot hear.

                    The scientist may declare that his approach is willful and therefore mindful, to what appears to be a mindless “evolutionary” process perceived as the Universe in existence. But if willfulness constitutes “mindfulness”, then even the scientist must admit that the logical evolution of the Void emanating as the Universe is in some way… “mindful”. 

                    If the nature of Primary Consciousness is to be in-tension with itself creating logical processes within itself, then this primary nature of intensity may be viewed as intrinsically willful, but then isn’t this also to be perceived as “in-tention-al”? If we interpret a logical progression of events, then we may interpret such progression as a form of intention, as the overall field of tension, (the Void itself), driving the entire process, (translating itself into existence within the view of cognizant extensions of itself). Since we are a part of the process ourselves, acting with intention, our “intention” must be interpreted as a translation of the in-tension, of the willfulness of Primary Consciousness.

The transposition of zero to the diversity of one!

                    In order to strengthen and facilitate the understanding of this concept, let us imagine “nothingness” to be equal to zero and existence to be equal to one. If nothingness emanates existence, how is it possible to get one out of zero, something out of nothing? Zero must be acted upon to display its capability of function.

                    In simple terms, it must become distorted and once such distortion takes place, zero, (Primary Consciousness), must reveal its essence, its capacity of internal function capable of manifesting all of the undivided “fractions” that would be the sum of existence. In order for this to occur, zero as nothingness, must contain within, all of the non-manifest, but essential fundamentals that would allow existence to occur …that “Void” once perceived by itself, may be interpreted as “Existence”. 

                    In this view, “nothingness” becomes substantive when subjected to interpretation. When interpretation is introduced into the picture, it is as if zero as nothingness …has been turned inside out - to reveal what existence is! (And actually, it is this process of “turning inside out”, of acting upon its own Unified Field – that creates the function of perception).

                    This means is that if Void is not experienced, the thought of it is emptiness, everywhereness/ nowhereness, nothingness …and when experienced – such emptiness, everywhereness/ nowhereness and nothingness is manifest as…

Totality, Diversity, Some-where-ness,
Some-when-ness …as Existence

                    Imagine an empty hard drive in a computer. It has all of the fundamentals for generating information, but generates none until its magnetic media is altered. The media was always there, but the information was not. When the media of the hard drive experiences’ information input, the media becomes distorted. It becomes rearranged and is then capable of expressing that information through a Central Processing Unit, (like an Animate Interface), to an observer – the computer user. 

                    If the media on that hard drive is given a special set of instructions by the computer user that allows it to continually interpret and rearrange itself, the observing computer user will experience an ever changing panorama of media expression on the computer monitor. This is the difference between “Nothingness” and “Somethingness”. The sense that we have of nothingness or Void, as the absence of existence, is an illusion generated by the complexity and limitations of the sensory devices of the Animate Interface. …But in the deeper view, rather than the absence of existence, the Void is the abstract of existence that we induct and deduce through our undivided, but interrupted interpretation of it.

                    If the magnetic media is undistorted throughout the hard drive, the same expression is everywhere. In order to have a somewhere, there must be a somewhere else, but if there is no division between here and there, then all that exists to an observer, such as a computer user is everywhere – and a Void everywhere, containing no information and no-things, (nothing), which is nowhere. 
As soon as information is put onto the hard drive however, the magnetic media is distorted into undivided parts of here and elsewhere. The media is still the media, still the environment of essentiality, still interconnected …but is now twisted to express a bordered view to the observer. Now the computer user can see the expression of information arise out of what was once perceived as no-thing, to be perceived as some-thing …from a blank screen to a screen filled with shapes and colors. 

                    Of course in this case, you know in advance that a magnetic medium existed prior to the generation of information and you also know how this maneuver of information generation was accomplished. By manipulating a magnetic medium perceived as no-thing-ness, it can be made to express some-thing-ness. How does this apply to what we perceive as our totality of existence however? – Think of the Magnetic Media of the Hard Drive as being analogous to the Space-Time Tensor Field of Primary Consciousness. We invented the hard drive and so prepared it in such a way that it could perform as it does. It does not produce three-dimensional objects that we can touch however and so although this analogy may be similar to the reality within which we exist, it does not quite meet the mark. Something is missing… as no matter how hard we try to get the hard drive to manifest a solid object, it will not, and yet “solid” objects surround us, including the hard drive.

The missing ingredient

                    If the computer user is removed from the scene and the computer is still allowed to self-generate information, what then is generated if no one is there to interpret? The computer, the hard drive and the information being generated now become a process of self-unified data integration, a mini-Universe without an external observer. Should an internal observer be generated within this mini-Universe as part of the magnetic medium itself however, that observer would directly experience the information at the same level that the information is being generated from. That observer must experience “solid” objects within such a frame of reference. If the internal observer is cognizant of herself and she is made of/extended from the same magnetic medium that is her environment, then all manifestations of that environment must appear as “reality” to this perceiver. The reason why is that this observer is extended from the same medium that all of the information contained within this magnetic medium also extends. She is no different in content than any other information being generated and is therefore no different in basic substance from that information. Its “code” and her “code” are the same. The magnetic medium therefore has become this observer’s direct environment, as the observer is constituted of that environment. 

                    Not realizing that she is extended/generated from the same medium that all other things within this environment also extend, because she is perceiving through an interface of the compound distortions of her body, (her sensory devices), she sees things as separate from herself and from each other …and perceives the “fragmented materiality” of a perceptually “divided” world. Furthermore, if our original instructions to the computer were to generate random data, we would see the expression of this data as disordered. The internal observer however would see this environment as natural because she is a part of it …and because it is natural to her, she would thus perceive her environment as ordered. 

                    The foundational medium of Primary Consciousness is purely and simply, an environmental self-translator …that through distortions of itself manifests electromagnetism through Inertial Self-Interaction, (of which we are a part) …that through our senses we interpret a narrow range as our perceived existence. All patterns that we perceive extend from it and we perceive “materiality” because we extend as inertially compounded electromagnetism from this field as well. We therefore exist on its level, as part of it …and in such an existence relate to it as real.

The Creation of In-Tension
(“Before” there was Space and Time)

                    This raises another question – How did Primary Consciousness manifest as an organized state if there was no programmer present to alter its homogenous – everywhere - configuration? The answer though seemingly paradoxical, is that because of its unique structure and medium, it automatically created and programmed itself in the following way;

                    A configuration of nowhere is implicit within the homogenous configuration of unorganized everywhere, (of Primordality), –the inertia of Primary Consciousness - which enables Primordality to become heterogeneous, (organized Primary Consciousness) …that “everywhere and nowhere” must form through their implicit relationship into the organized state of “somewhere and elsewhere”. This differential state of Primordality, (“unorganized nothingness” …pre-consciousness – “chaos”), results in the forming of the organized Inertial Tensor Field of Primary Consciousness. The elements of perception are therefore implicit within Primordality and are inducted through chaotic encounter into a Tensor Field, the result of which is the forming of an organized state of perceptive/ creative – comprehensive Primary Consciousness that manifests as existence within the view of cognizant extensions of itself such as we and other life forms. 

A representation of the self-driven wholeness of existence

                    The lower graphic represents the dynamism of the void expressing as existence. The upper graphic numerically shows how. The numbers within 10, (as ten parts of the one wholeness), when laid out in self-reflection run:

2, 3, 4, 5, 1
9, 8, 7, 6, 0

                    When the upper and lower parts of each column are added together they equal 11, (the zero actually represents ten), as 10 plus the intrinsic dynamism of the wholeness - as the entirety of the wholeness. So the “one” of the wholeness, divided by ten parts is represented as the ten undivided from and in experiential self-encounter with the one from which they extend …of the one in self-experience. Because self-experience is intrinsic to wholeness, wholeness must express as existence to that which is undivided from it. A wholeness of zero works the same way – expressing as “one”, plus the dynamism of “one”, to its undivided parts thus creating a field of perpetual translation.

                    Each aspect of this dualistic configuration, everywhere and nowhere, is contained within and is a part of the other. Such complexity/simplicity of configuration is on its own level, one of non-sensory “self”-experienced reality, a reality from which we extend and then neurally/synthetically perceive. If we think about the realm of homogeneity it would at first appear to us that there is only everywhere because there are no organized configurations that would separate here from there. With further thought, we come to understand that the realm of everywhere, (infinite, unconditional area), is also the realm of nowhere, (infinitely constrained, conditional area), – the point. We also come to understand that the notion of endlessness is implicit within the realm of everywhere and therefore “timelessness” – the instant, is implicit within the “point” realm of nowhere …hence the point/instant. 

                    These two aspects of “unorganized nothingness” are an intrinsic duality that must manifest as compounded totality, as diversified multiplicity, as existence …in that the realm of the conditional is intrinsic to the realm of the unconditional. 

                    A Tensor Field is just this – a force acting upon itself. The unconditional property of the field is - that it is. The Tensor Field of the Multiverse is a unity of wholeness that became so by the implicit encounter of Primordality upon itself, (nowhere implicit within everywhere), that has enabled its state of being. As such, it is precharged with the intrinsic aspects that allow it to act upon itself.

                    The conditional property of the field is its intrinsic nature to act upon itself, which maintains its unconditionality as its continuity. It is within this realm of the Everywhere/Nowhere Field of “Primordial Nothingness”, (translated to the Locality-Non-Locality Field of Primary Consciousness), that the “where and when” of Space-Time …as the representation to an observer/experiencer of “everywhere”, (the homogeneity of the Tensor Field), experienced as the passage of time …and “nowhere”, (the heterogeneity of the Tensor Field), interacting …creates a - Field Self-Experience that enables the totality of such “Organized Nothingness” to become its own interpreter as…

The Pen that writes upon itself!

                    By the very nature of its composition, such “Nothingness” must display as the imaged perception of somethingness to a living observer that extends from it …and as the instantaneous, placeless process of auto-thought, (implicit will), within its own self-experience. The following paragraphs explain in greater detail, the process of auto-thought as the unconditional/conditional will of this Inertial Tensor Field emanating as existence.

                    We theoretically view zero and one as perfect numbers, zero as perfectly devoid of anything and one as all inclusive of any sum of the fractions that would establish it.

Do the perfect numbers one and zero actually exist however?

                    If I show you an apple in my hand, you might say that I have one apple. Apples however, come in different sizes and for that matter, each apple is uniquely distinct from all others as its molecular pattern differs slightly through infinite variations of apple evolution. If you were to measure the apple, it might measure 4 inches across, but what did you measure it with? If you used a ruler and then I used a micrometer, I would get a finer measurement. 

                    If you next found and used a finer measuring device, you would then get an even finer measurement. At some point during finer and finer measurements, the finest measuring device would invade and affect the structure of the apple and change its form in some way thereby disturbing its measurable size. This is related to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, (the implicit rule of imperfection within existence as the represented Tension of the Void emanating as continuous change), which basically means that the more one penetrates into the existence of an object, the more disturbed the object becomes and the less measurable, (the less perfect, the less certain), the object is. 

                    The more intimately we explore the materiality of an object, the less materiality will that object display. The more we explore the energy that is the construct of the materiality of the object, the less we see of energy and the more we see of our own perception. In the final analysis, we find that we are ultimately exploring ourselves as we are extended from that which we began to explore in the first place. 

                    We perceive existence as inertial moments manifesting in multiplicity – all of the same virtual moment differentiating in relation to itself and therefore in relation to ourselves – as we are a part of it. When we look more closely, matter dissolves to energy and then energy dissolves to a common, but differentiated tensor symmetry. 

                    We are part of that symmetry and so when we act, we cause the symmetry, which includes ourselves, to undergo complimentary change in answer to our action. We cause the “motion” through action upon the field of environment that simultaneously “moves” us as well – The harder we try to remain as we were, the more difficult it is to remain where we were – The harder we try to hold onto something, the more elusive it becomes. At some point, the very act of measuring alters the object being measured. Time, (in our sensory perception), would also have to pass during measuring and the apple would degrade due to entropy, (the natural seeking of equilibrium), generated by the common field from which it and we extend. The actual size of the apple would always be changing over “time” and therefore, the apple’s size could only be approximated, but never measured exactly.

                    If we switch to something which appears to be more stable, such as a one ounce bar of 24kt gold, we would once again find slight imperfections in the purity of the gold and these imperfections would degrade over “time”, continually changing its measurability. Additionally, the accuracy of the finest measuring device would always come into question and once again, we would only get a close approximation of measurement, but never an exact one. Finally, if we were able to refine the measuring device even further, the act of measuring would affect the structure of the gold bar, thereby changing it once again.

                    What has been expressed though generally missed within the Heisenberg theory is that the measurer and the measured are indivisibly connected as one, as the same entity expressed in different ways. The person, the apple and the measuring device are all extensions of the same Tensor Field of Primary Consciousness represented differently, but simultaneously, and when the measurer measures a different representation of itself, the measurement changes while measuring because all representations change through the interactive process of measuring. 

                    The Pen that writes upon itself must appear as the paper to the ink! We are the ink, and in the greater view, also the paper …as the ink is a distortion of the paper and therefore a part of it. In the ultimate view, the paper and the ink are extended of the Pen, of which we are also a part. The Pen that writes upon itself is perceived by a cognizant extension of itself as the paper …and the ink in order to be interpreted as being sensible, is perceived as separated patterns of “environmental existence”. 

                    Because these patterns are actually undivided from each other and also undivided from each of ourselves, when we apply measurement to what we perceive as a separate thing, the process of measuring becomes interactive. The object being measured reciprocally measures the measuring instrument, both receiving intention translated to action from the person measuring, (who is also being measured). Measuring therefore is an interactive process, the apple or gold bar extending to meet the measuring instrument and the instrument extending to meet the apple or gold bar. 
As measuring occurs, that part of the measuring instrument that engages that of which is being measured, achieve together a comprehension, (a dissolving into), of their primary state of indivisibility. What originally appeared as materiality through less intense measurement dematerializes through the greater intensity of the engagement by Localized Consciousness, (the measurer), of an extension of itself, (the measured). 

                    The person as the measurer, the measuring instrument and that which is intended to be measured are all representations and part of the same interconnected media and therefore,

Inertia now represented as Consciousness through the imagery
of “measuring”, in fact, more intimately experiences itself

                    What we label as “Imagery” is an expression of the interactive process of the Inertial Tensor Field experiencing itself …of Primary Consciousness in experiential self-encounter, manifested as Localized Consciousness experiencing “Existence”.

                    “Nothingness/Existence” as the Inertial Tensor Field is being described here as Consciousness, and Consciousness then is composed of “Inertial Being”, which is the interactive compounding of the Field upon itself, in self-continuity/self comprehension. We know of consciousness as being aware of ourselves and of our environment, but if we are extended from our environment, as an integral part of it, isn’t our environment then conscious as well?

                    This is so if our environment and we are indivisibly connected and constituted of the same media – the same compounded Field of Will. We are then, Inertia transformed to Localized Consciousness, perceiving through an animate form, (also constructed of inertia), that allows interpretation through its sensory devices of - this and that, it and I, here and there, now and then. We perceive “reality” because we are the substance of reality in that we are undivided from the greater totality of what we perceive. (Each of us is a bump in the “oneness blanket” of Primary Consciousness perceiving other bumps in the same blanket).

                    We see a rock lying on the ground and we imagine that this rock does not perceive us, but in order for the rock to be, an underlying continuity must maintain its existence. As conscious beings, we are part of that continuity, differentiated in form, but indivisible from the rock. In order for us to see the rock as materiality, that underlying continuity must also be an underlying unity between the rock and ourselves. In the non-sensory perception of the rock, all that is existence, including each of ourselves, is the rock itself. This is the level of consciousness of a rock. This is so because the primary rule of perception, as shown earlier within this writing, is that only self -cognizant distortion’s of a common field can perceive other distortions of the same field as separately and materially existent. The rock is not self-cognizant and therefore is not aware of separations within its environment. To the rock, the environment of which we are a part, is its own totality, (a perception – as funny as it is - that we as self-interpretive beings, should, and are beginning to achieve). Clearly, through greater understanding, self-cognizant beings may also perceive themselves and other distortions within the field as non-material and through the highest understanding may perceive the Field in its entirety as a unified, undivided state of effortless, joyful consciousness. 

                    We can say that the existence of the rock is maintained by the energy forces of its construct undivided from the energy forces of its environment and this is perfectly true, but aren’t we as well? In the greater view, we, the rock and the environment within which we exist are all emanations of the same unified medium manifesting in different ways. It compounds itself and confounds itself and out of this enfolded homogeneity arises an interconnected heterogeneous terrain of diversity. 

                    As living organisms, we have the ability to perceive the compounded topography of Primary Consciousness as “existence” and “reality” because our sensory devices focus our Localized Consciousness to an awareness of “where we are”. That does not mean that consciousness unfocused does not exist. It means that consciousness through unlimited experience of itself, (through trial and error –through the evolution of experience), built an interface for itself and then - at once - found itself to be focused.

                    In its basic non-sensory form, Primary Consciousness does not experience through neural imagery. In its compound form it exists as a topography that is only interpretable as “unique realities” by the differentiated and therefore unique animate forms, (such as we and other life forms as Localized Consciousness’), existing as undivided parts of that topography. The confoundedness of this topography only arises paradoxically, when Primary Consciousness constructs such an Animate Interface of itself to focus through in order to make sense out of what it sees …and then because of this …loses sight of itself! J In fact, it was always “reality”, just untranslated, non-localized, non-cerebral reality. Clearly then, paradox is a translational property of our differentiated localized comprehension – perceiving the “twists” of Primary Consciousness in an indirect, but undivided way. Because Primary Consciousness inherently discovered itself, it developed foundational awareness and got a “taste” for experience. As a result, the emotion of anticipation was born through the evolution of animate forms. Anticipation through the Animate Interface brought with it desire, and that continued the compoundment of Primary Consciousness into ever more cultivated phenomena in order to further the adventure and therefore the sophistication of its experience. The animate form adds levels of interpretation to experience through imagery because the animate form is a specialized interface to experience.

                    We are generally not aware of direct experience, but rather we experience through that which we are focused, our senses and interpretive brain. Because we are “localized” in this fashion, we see ourselves as being here and all other things as being elsewhere. Within the instantaneity of the Tensor Field, the property of Be-ing is the Tension of the moment, (stress points within the wholeness of the Virtual Moment by its tension upon itself). Within that “moment”, all that constitutes our perception of “Time” and “Space” is implicit. The tension of the moment of Primary Consciousness trans-emanates equally in all directions rendering Primary Consciousness directionless unless a distortion of Primary Consciousness that is cognizant, perceives it. Within such localized perception, the illusioned difference between the cognizant perceiver as an extension and that from which it extends, creates an interpreted direction of “Time” and “Space” within the relative perception of the cognizant extension.

                    Because the cognizant extension perceives himself as well as that from which he extends, he sees himself as where he is and when he is. Perception of the tension that draws the future is cut off within the interpretation of he who perceives himself to exist within the present, because to exist as a “self” precludes a direct experience of unity with that from which he extends. The compounded electromagnetism, (body and brain), that is the interface that he interprets through, only allows an imprinting of illusioned experience upon itself, but is not sophisticated enough to allow the perception of the Tensor Field in its totality. In simple terms, the limitations of the animate form prevent the sensible interpretation of what we imagine as the future, as part of our current experience. This restriction is another example of the illusion of bordered existence, (separateness), within a cohesive field.

                    If he would realize that he is indirectly experiencing that from which he actually extends through a limited interface however, then he might try to find a new way to experience his “environment” directly. He would occasionally disconnect from his senses, (ignoring his short term memory through deep meditation), and in this way discount his interface completely, thereby achieving an altered state of perception that would allow direct interpretation of his unity with the Primary Consciousness from which he extends. He would see all of “Time” as the singular virtual moment, as an expanded view of the present ...as the totality of all of existence. By experimentally, temporarily giving up the notion of “self”, which is the illusion of separateness generated by perception through an interface, he would also be giving up the notion that the present is an interruption between the past and the future. All of time, previously perceived as the past and as the future, interrupted by the present, would then be for him instantly comprehensible within his perception of the “Virtual Moment”. 

                    So, how is this possible? As shown earlier within this writing, we are each a duality of perception, in one way interpreting our greater extensity of Primary Consciousness through our animate forms, interfacially and therefore indirectly as our “environment” - and in the other, each perceiving as unique facets of Primary Consciousness in direct experience of our greater extensity. When we bypass the animate form through deep meditation, we directly and simply experience the totality of existence …as “souls”. 

                    Because we imagine separateness between objects, we label everything, including ideas. We also invent intervening ideas, (shells of interpretation/expression), that help us to, “measure”. One example of an intervening idea that we all use is the concept of distance. If we draw or imagine a line from point A to point B and then move our hand between these points, we can imagine an infinite number of interruptions in the line. 

                    Based upon this imagination, we can further imagine that our hand, although perceived as continuously in motion, is at rest at any instant in “Time” that coincides with any point in “Space” that we infer to the line. Through the use of imagination therefore, we create a line with infinite points and then apply through imagery to these points, instants in time. We then superimpose, as an added level of interpretation, the imagined line with its points and instants to the perceived motion of our hand. From our standpoint of perception through our sensory-motor interface, it seems perfectly natural for us to interpret what we perceive as “external” to us in this way, to superimpose our imagination upon the quality of a process, (to perceptually project “out there”), to make that process quantifiable and to appear sensible to us.

                    What is forgotten through the superimposition of imagination however, is that the motion of our hand has a start, (A), and an end, (B), based upon our intent. What lies between points A and B, is a process of interactive propagation, (transaction of experience), through which Consciousness merges with Consciousness, (merges with itself). The line that we invent is an imagination between points A and B, containing all other imaginations within it that we self-express, therefore allowing us to self-interpret the propagative process. All that we really wanted from our hand was that it should no longer remain at point, (A), and that it should now remain at point, (B). We perceive the process by which this happens through the use of superimposed imagery that we revolve between our Localized Consciousness, our hand… and the “environment” within which our hand appears to move. In order to make the process that we perceive sensible to us, we see the propagative process as “motion”, when in fact it is only changing differentiations of potentiality – as changes in stress of the Tensor Field that Localized Consciousness creates through its superimposition of the imageries of its undivided comprehension. We get the notion of superimposing imagery from interpreting what we perceive as the “External Environment” through an Animate Interface positioned between that environment and our Localized Consciousness. 
The thoughts therefore, of, “space and time”, “point and instant”, “matter and energy”, and “position and motion” are the required imaginations and thus the customary interpretations, that enable a localized extension of Primary Consciousness bearing self-awareness, (such as each of ourselves), to interact with itself, (the Localized Consciousness), and with its perceived “external” environment, (Primary Consciousness from which Localized Consciousness extends). Such an extension of Primary Consciousness is perceptually focused through, and thus has become accustomed to an interpretation of “dividedness” within the heterogeneity of its “environment” through the use of an animate form.

                    A friend of mine described our “Animate” condition by saying that the world we perceive is governed by the laws of physics - in whatever form they may be interpreted - and since our animate structures, and we as Localized Consciousnesses are extended from that world, we are governed by those laws as well. The perceptual/ interpretive devices that we use, (sensory organs and brain), to experience ourselves and our “environment”, are “physically” constructed and so are compatible with the rest of the physical world. 

                    The best we can do however, while focused through an Animate Interface, is to interpret the “world” in the interfacial, indirect way that we do. Although such interpretation is indirect, it is usually good enough to get us through life, and the paradoxes that are created by such indirect experience can usually be handled on a day-to-day basis by treating the results of the paradox as problems to be solved. We therefore spend a great deal of time continually mending illusioned problems, (treating the symptoms), when the actual cause of such “problems” in fact goes unnoticed. To notice the underlying cause of a “problem” however is the real key to its solution because to pay attention to the paradox is to see it and then to adjust one's thought process through understanding. Once this adjustment is accomplished, the effect one has on others and upon one's “environment” causes real change. One cannot clean up a polluted river by just removing the toxins downstream …if the river is continually being poisoned upstream. In order to notice something and pay attention to it however, one must first be made aware of it. 

                    This writing of The Grand Universe is meant to do just that …to make the reader aware of their undividedness to that which they perceive, to point out the paradox and to bring it into the foreground of comprehension. There are several other books that deal with the “paradox of perception” that I highly recommend, as they are Jewels lying amidst the accumulated writings of mankind… 

1.                 The speed technique to Alpha Meditation and Visualization - by Harold Kamph. This writing has an elegant innocence about it that can only be projected by a selfless master.

2.                 On Dialogue - by David Bohm, edited by Lee Nichol. This writing goes far in unraveling the paradox of the relationship of Localized Consciousness and Collective Consciousness. I consider this book “a must” to read.

3.                 Wholeness and the Implicate Order - by David Bohm. This writing beautifully describes the nature of Primary Consciousness - the Quantum Universe and beyond. A knowledge of calculus and statistical math would be helpful while reading through this work, but is not absolutely necessary to understand the imageries that it projects.

4.                 Matter and Memory - by Henry Bergson. This writing takes you on a trip through the paradox of superimposed imagery, and further brings out the undividedness of existence. 

5.                 Time and Free Will - by Henry Bergson. This writing goes to the depths of the inter-relationships of Primary/Localized Consciousness - almost mystical.

6.                 Unified Reality Theory, (The Dynamic Structure of Space) - by Steven Kaufman. This writing is produced, in my opinion, by one of the most profound minds on our planet, although Mr. Kaufman shuns any reference to this description of himself. His work is to be published in October of 2001. The work is filled with graphical images that make the text easy to understand. Steven Kaufman is a “one of a kind” and this planet and our society are blessed to have him among us.

7.                 The Tibetan Book of the Dead - Tibetan scriptures translated and narrated by Robert Thurman. This writing brings into the foreground of understanding the perceptions of a disembodied Soul as well as the knowledge required to navigate the Void without the encumbrances of an Animate Interface. The title of this work is misleading because it is really a partial translation of “The Great Book of Natural Liberation through Understanding in the Between”. This work is filled with wonderfully detailed concepts of transitions between animate and disembodied existence and shows the path for experiencing disembodied excursions into the void while still associated with the Animate Interface. Furthermore, it describes the various realms of existence that a soul may achieve beyond the human state of affairs and in place of reincarnation, while also describing the processes of reincarnation in intricate detail. This work also provides a wide range of prayers between the living and those who have passed on, that enable the living to guide a Soul through the “Straits of the Between”, to enlightenment and to a more pleasant existence.

8.                 Albert Einstein Philosopher-Scientist – Published by the Library of Living
Philosophers – Volume VII. An autobiography by Albert Einstein, which he jokingly calls his obituary – and in the deeper sense, perhaps not so jokingly …because this work also contains 25 critical essays written by his contemporaries that both applaud and criticize his work, (he also answers back). Theories of existence are investigated from every conceivable concept and if one reads through this work carefully, a comprehensive understanding of both sensory perception and deductive reasoning will certainly be achieved.

9.                 A Tour of the Calculus by David Berlinsky. A mind trek through the “MathMass”
led by a master of both mathematics and prose. Another must reading for anyone wishing to fathom the connection between perception and the intrinsic tension within mathematical functions …and anyone can understand this work, if they are persistent, (some passages may have to be reread several times, but it is worth the effort).

   
Press Control-D to bookmark this page

Return to Table of Contents Return to Presentation Page
Do you have a suggestion about or criticism of this page? Please send us an Email

Think you can improve the readability of this page?

Click for Details Online Editing or Offline Editing

Your Editorial Contributions are welcome!

To Edit this Page Online
Click Here

If sending improved Graphics please send as a separate Email with Graphic File attachments, Jpeg or Gif,  no larger than 10K per Graphic. If sending Mathematical Symbols please send as a separate Email. Please include your True Type Math Font as an email attachment. Please send all Emails containing Graphics or Math Symbols to; Editor@Primordality.com.

Return to Page Navigation