Chapter 2

TRANSLATION OF THE FOUNDATIONAL CODE INTO CLASSICAL REALITY
(The Cerebral Synthesis of Existence)


It's all thought into Be-ing!

                        We think of nothingness as an absence of existence, or as a Void. In such a perception we cannot imagine how nothingness may emanate as existence, but intuitively we know that it must, for when we ask ourselves, “What was there before the Universe existed?” – we always come to the concept of “nothing”. Confusion thus arises within our interpretation of “nothing”, for we then ask, “How can something come out of nothing?” The only logical answer that can be is that if it can, then our concept of “nothing”, and therefore of existence, is in some way misdirected. With this understanding in mind - Science, Religion and Philosophy have attempted various approaches to this paradox only to be hampered again and again by the elusiveness of “nothingness”.

                    Our natural perception of nothingness demands that we perceive no “things” within it. Within such a view, we are first led to ask; “What is outside of the Universe?” If an outside cannot be imagined, then the next logical question must be asked; – “If there is no outside, if the Universe is all there is, how did it get here?” On the surface, we seem to be caught in a paradox. If there is nothing outside of the Universe, then how could a Universe possibly occur if nothing was before to create it? Attempts to answer this question have taken the form of;

1.                 “God, as a separate being, created the Universe.” If nothing is outside of the Universe, is God nothing? (The answer would be - Yes - if nothingness emanates as existence). No? God is existent as a being? – then how was God created? The answer always comes back – “God created himself”. Hmmm …just how did he do that?

                    As illogical as this answer seems to be, it is the only one that makes sense if “God” is the “nothingness” that we have misconceived, that is emanating as “existence” within our view. 

                    Of course, on the surface this is difficult to digest, as such a statement leaves us with but two choices, to reject or to accept that which we may not understand …that which our minds may refute as irrational and therefore as incomprehensible. And, many of us do reject this …many of us say “there is no God.” …but among those who say this, probably every one of them would secretly wish that a loving, benevolent God did exist, as our own existences appear to be so fragile.

                    If such a “God” did exist and could satisfactorily be explained however, then both Science and Religion would have a partnership, a conceptual platform upon which a unity of ideas could be expressed. Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg, Max Planck, Neils Bohr, David Bohm, Hendrik Lorentz and untold other Scientist/Philosophers both past and present, have all come to the same following conclusion … “In order for an individual to be a participator/observer of reality, that individual must be an integral part of that reality”. What this means is that “reality is affected by the observer when such reality is observed.” This also means that “unobserved reality” is different than when observed …that unobserved “Nothingness”, when observed - is “Somethingness”. When Localized Consciousness as the observer engages the “implicit qualities” of Primary Consciousness to make a reality, a mental picture of “what is” serves itself up to the level of the understanding of the observer – and no further. If higher understanding is achieved, “what is” then changes to meet the higher level. “What is” therefore, is an interactive process of those who experience it.

2.                 “The Universe doesn’t really exist …(reality as an illusion), It’s just a perception in our minds.” How can that be, if we are here to perceive it? This is an altered view of those who understand that reality is an integral part of the observer. They realize that existence is what one makes of it to the level of one’s understanding. What is missed here is that the observer is part of the observed, as an extension of the conceived reality. Within this abstraction, if the Universe does not exist, then the observer does not exist as well and therefore the comment could not be made. By making the comment, the observer validates her existence and therefore the existence of what she observes as the Universe. “Reality” then is a concept of one sort in the mind of the observer, but may be conjectured as different or nonexistent when unobserved, but imagined …and then interpreted as “nothingness” …and then with a little more thought, interpreted as Dynamic Nothingness, Primary Consciousness, the Primordial Force …or as “God”. 

                    If the observer sees herself as an extension of the Universe however, then she is a short step from widening her view to see herself as the Universe …and the Universe as herself …within such a concept, to envision her true existence. 

                    In this view, she “is” …and what she perceives as the “Universe”, is her extended interpretation of herself. In this expanded view she still has control over her body as an extension of her “self” and she has limited control over what her body can touch and manipulate, but at this point, direct control over “what is” goes’ no further. If she is extended from everything that she perceives and even beyond that which she perceives, does she need to control everything that “is” because such “everything” is a part of her? At this level of understanding, she is able to recognize that all that is extended from her, from which she also extends, (cause within the effect), exists automatically without her direct intentional control, (as our hearts beat - without our direct intentional control). She now interprets with new vision > that the greater part of her exists “as it is”, supporting her localized Being …because she and her extensity are one, and that from which she extends is functioning without her intentional control. (Here we have a greater notion of “God” as the foundation that supports our existence without our direct intentional control over it – as we have natural faith in it). She may act within this greater part of herself to the limit of her understanding, but that which she may observe and that which she does not observe and cannot control, continues to do what it does without her direct influence upon it ...this she comprehends. She may now observe and contemplate her greater extensity, and perhaps through increased understanding, perceptually join with it. 

                    She may accomplish this through bypassing her short-term memory and thereby free her sequential perception from the limits of her “Animate Interface”, (as many do through meditation), to achieve greater control through concurrent perception. But through such observation and understanding she will reach the conclusion that direct intentional control over her extensity is not required …as such control was always automatically in effect. She will come to an understanding of the paradox between sequential and concurrent interpretation, and thus come to a higher realization that will dissolve the paradox. 

                    Through such understanding, she will come to realize that control and balance on a previously unrecognized level was always there. She would then further understand that her birth into what appears to be a Universe, originally perceiving herself as a separate entity, was merely a way that Primary Consciousness extended a contiguous part of itself into a cognizant form …into an observer of itself that is she. All of her new interpretations of life's situations therefore would be modified through such an understanding. She would know the reason for all things …that which we call “purpose”, through her recognition and unraveling of the paradox. She would see that all of Primary Consciousness is a Singular Unified Field, Entity, Being …and know that “IT” is she …and she is “IT”! 

                    What she would have previously interpreted as life's hardships, would now be regarded as trivialities …to be easily handled, or dismissed through her greater understanding of the undivided Wholeness of Primary Consciousness in concurrent comprehension of Itself/Herself. To understand the “paradox” is to unravel all confusion and all “hardship”. For what is to be thought of as a “hardship”, if it is a concurrent process within one's own Unified Being? The recognition of the paradox …the understanding of it – unravels it …and modifies one's perception of all occurrences, of all things.

                    Isn't anxiety sequential? Don't we build on it …making theoretical pictures of what might happen next? And don't we further compound our “difficult” situations by building them into something that they never truly are? We suffer for our sequential perception of our own concurrent processes. The Void, from which we each extend, acts in a unified, synchronous way within its own concurrent Totality. We only see the process however in a sequential way, and never get a clear picture of its entirety. Our interpretation therefore is “This just happened! …What will happen next?” We would not worry at all if we understood that all situations are parts of the Totality from which we are undivided. Through our sequential interpretation however, it is like we “walk into situations”, not able to see the big picture …and then experience anxiety over “what will happen next”, not realizing that all things are concurrent. We then take our anxiety and superimpose it over our sequential perception, thus imagining “what is not” as “what is”, which may further compound a situation into something even more unexpected, thus increasing our anxiety.

                    This is the paradox that has guided the evolution of our DNA …to react to our perceived “separate” and sometimes unexpected “environmental” conditions, perhaps a good thing in some ways, to have evolved us to our level of existence …and a not so good thing …to have kept us in a perpetual state of confusion and illusion. Once we recognize it however, it is neither good nor bad, it just is …and we may then learn how to deal with it.

3.                 “Another Universe collapsed down to a seed and re-exploded into what we currently perceive as our Universe.” That brings us back to the original question – How did the prior Universe get here if nothing was before it? To answer that this is a continuing cycle of collapse and explosion, side steps the original question because we must then ask – how did the cycle begin? 

                    After exhausting every conjecture, we find that our thoughts always end up back in the same frustrating place, back to our original concept of “nothingness”. Confounded, we conclude that we now have but three courses of action open to us:

A.                 To continue the search through a dissection of existence/“environment”, looking deeper and deeper into atoms, nucleons, leptons and quarks to find the original foundation. We already see however, that such a search infinitely tends closer and closer to nothingness.

B.                 We may just give up the search and accept existence as it is. That might be okay for some, but many of us are too inquisitive to allow the search to end. Those that pursue the search will continually affect the understanding of those who do not. The views of those who would accept existence “as it is”, are thus subtly changed by the continuing advancement of higher knowledge …and of course at some point, even the attitudes of those who would just accept things “as they are”, would be changed into that of the searcher.

C.                 If all of our searching and all of our concepts eventually lead us back to nothingness, then we may intuitively assume that existence is somehow connected to what we imagine as nothingness, as we all in fact - extra-consciously - do. We may then begin from “nothingness” as the foundation of existence with a realization that our original interpretation of nothingness …and therefore of existence, may have been incorrect.

                    If “reality” directs our interpretation to that from which it extends, then “nothingness” may not be what we think it is…

                    Let us suppose that the underlying code of existence, as Void or nothingness, is a translatable environmental medium that may be interpreted in a particular way by any distortion of itself, depending upon how that “area” is constructed, (convoluted). Put simply, if a twist of what we imagine to be Void or nothingness is convoluted in a particular way, it will interpret that which it is a part of and extended from – it’s base environment, in a complimentary and therefore unique way. If it is convoluted in another way, it will interpret its base environment differently. Each twist or distortion of the base environment is an extension of that environment, a convolution …and although a part of it, is either constructed differently from any other area, or if constructed in the same way, is uniquely oriented, or on a different level and therefore has a different perspective/interpretation of the whole of the environment. And of course such “nothingness” being timeless, spaceless and therefore – sizeless, is therefore instantaneous, and is thus as well, transcendent within and of itself. (It must have such qualities, as it is opposed to itself as an undivided totality).

                    In this view, the base environment and its internal realities, (distortions/ extensions - convolutions of the base of “nothingness”), are the same because they are indivisibly connected, interpenetrated and are constituted of the same medium, but are also different because each convolution of this medium occupies a unique relative reality to the wholeness from which they extend – and because they extend – even though they are indivisibly connected and interpenetrated, (The trans-emanation of a totality – the action of a Wholeness upon itself, generates an infinite diversity of patterns within itself). This base medium then, at its most essential level is a symmetry that when distorted and compounded, generates an illusion of itself to cognizant extensions of itself, (beings of self-awareness like ourselves), as asymmetry – dividedness – objects and spaces, times and events that occupy here and there, and now and then. What we imagine then as “nothingness”, would be of an unconstructed, undistorted, (unexperienced), environmental medium, which in truth is not that way, but in reality is always constructed of itself and further constructing. The confusion that we experience regarding the concept of nothingness is that we perceive separation between objects in existence when in fact, all objects are actually constructed of and connected through the foundational medium that “nothingness” is. The connection is through an intangible field of symmetry, (Inertia as Thought), of implicit intensity that generates the illusion of explicit asymmetry, of dividedness, to the cognizant interpreter …who is an extension of it. 

                    Look closely at this …As we are extensions of the implicit, we see the implicit as the explicit, as divided and fragmented, because although we are undivided from it, we are each a uniquely oriented part of it – an ordered extension of it.

                    The underlying unity between all patterns of existence is that they, (including we), are distortions/extensions – compoundments of the undivided whole, of the convoluted symmetry of Primary Consciousness, of that which we interpret as both the Void, (nothingness), in one view …and as Existence in another.

                    Consider for a moment your notion of nothingness …is it sequential or concurrent? Do you see it as a Wholeness or as a fragmentation? Now consider your notion of “environmental existence” ...do you see this as concurrent or sequential? Do you see this as a Wholeness or as a fragmentation? If “nothingness” is “environmental existence” ...then one can get a glimpse of the paradox …if both “nothingness” and “existence” are, in the substructure of reality, the same. If you can first visualize “nothingness” as a singular Wholeness …and then give it a perceptual “twist”, you can visualize the Superstructure …and the Substructure of our reality combined as a singular Totality. Imagine it first as a perfectly round balloon – This is the homogeneous Locality-Non-Locality, Everywhere/Nowhere Field of Primordality. 

                    Now twist that balloon into two equal parts, undivided from each other, but uniquely oriented to each other …This is “existence” generated from “nothingness” ...a relativity, as two Universal Spans becoming within the Multiverse. Now twist each part again and again until there are two homogenous mediums, relative to each other, though undivided from each other. Now, merge the two homogeneous mediums so that they interpenetrate each other in that each maintains a substructural “individuality” that is perceptually indistinguishable from any part of the Totality …this is “Space-Time”, (or in the deeper view – two Inbounded interpenetrated systems of Primary Consciousness – two Universal Spans undivided but still relative – intermixing “Locality” with “Non-Locality”), as the representative Unified Field of the Void. 

                    Now twist Space-Time into relative macroscopic and microscopic parts, still undivided from each other - as parts of this “Unified Field” …These configurations are quantizations of “energy and matter” that synchronously depend upon one another …and upon the Unified field from which they extend. Now finally consider that you are an undivided part of this …that your consciousness and its consciousness are the same, that you are not only uniquely oriented within it, but that because of your understanding of it you may visualize all of it as your undivided extensity …as yourself - You are “IT” and “IT” is you! 

                    When you try to look at it through your animate form, you perceive it in an oriented way, first seeing one part, then the next …and the next, over time, (through its convolutions). But when you conceive the Totality of it in a concurrent way, you realize that what you have been imagining as “Time” …is the Totality itself …that you have been interpreting sequentially. This understanding in itself dissolves the paradox and modifies one's view of all encountered situations. Additionally, this is not an emotionless realization… indeed, it removes negative anxiety regarding the “unknown” and further removes anxiety from the illusioned “known”, replacing this negative emotion with radiant joy and contentment. Once this understanding of the Totality manifests within you and you know that you are undivided from it, all perceived “threats” to your existence are then dissolved …for how can a Totality threaten itself? Coming to this understanding is like waking up from a fragmented dream. One becomes centered and perfectly balanced without effort. One becomes …One. 

                    Our perceived “environment” is the Unified Field of Primary Consciousness, that when compounded, (folded upon itself in an infinity of ways), manifests within the view of cognizant extensions of itself, (such as we), as existence. Because we cannot readily see the connections between the folds, we perceive the folds as separate objects, which give us the illusion, that nothing, or non-existence lies between. 

                    An unconstructed environment, like an invisible page, yet to be written upon, is what we would then imagine Primary Consciousness to be …if the only way to interpret that the page is there …is when we see the writing upon it.

   
Press Control-D to bookmark this page

Return to Table of Contents Return to Presentation Page
Do you have a suggestion about or criticism of this page? Please send us an Email

Think you can improve the readability of this page?

Click for Details Online Editing or Offline Editing

Your Editorial Contributions are welcome!

To Edit this Page Online
Click Here

If sending improved Graphics please send as a separate Email with Graphic File attachments, Jpeg or Gif,  no larger than 10K per Graphic. If sending Mathematical Symbols please send as a separate Email. Please include your True Type Math Font as an email attachment. Please send all Emails containing Graphics or Math Symbols to; Editor@Primordality.com.

Return to Page Navigation